Title 40
PART 132 APPENDIX B
Priority | Technique |
---|---|
1 | Slow-stir. |
1 | Generator-column. |
1 | Shake-flask. |
2 | Reverse-phase liquid chromatography on C18 chromatography packing with extrapolation to zero percent solvent. |
3 | Reverse-phase liquid chromatography on C18 chromatography packing without extrapolation to zero percent solvent. |
4 | Calculated by the CLOGP program. |
Log KOW >4:
Priority | Technique |
---|---|
1 | Slow Stir. |
1 | Generator-column. |
2 | Reverse-phase liquid chromatography on C18 chromatography packing with extrapolation to zero percent solvent. |
3 | Reverse-phase liquid chromatography on C18 chromatography packing without extrapolation to zero percent solvent. |
4 | Shake-flask. |
5 | Calculated by the CLOGP program. |
2. The CLOGP program is a computer program available from Pomona College. A value of KOW that seems to be different from the others should be considered an outlier and not used. The value of KOW used for an organic chemical shall be the geometric mean of the available KOW s with highest priority or can be calculated from the arithmetic mean of the available log KOW with the highest priority. Because it is an intermediate value in the derivation of a BAF, the value used for the KOW of a chemical should not be rounded to fewer than three significant digits and a value for log KOW should not be rounded to fewer than three significant digits after the decimal point.
G. This methodology provides overall guidance for the derivation of BAFs, but it cannot cover all the decisions that must be made in the review and selection of acceptable data. Professional judgment is required throughout the process. A degree of uncertainty is associated with the determination of any BAF, BSAF, BCF or KOW. The amount of uncertainty in a baseline BAF depends on both the quality of data available and the method used to derive the BAF.
H. Hereinafter in this methodology, the terms BAF, BSAF, BCF and KOW refer to ones that are consistent with the procedural and quality assurance requirements given above.
IV. Four Methods for Deriving Baseline BAFsBaseline BAFs shall be derived using the following four methods, which are listed from most preferred to least preferred:
A. A measured baseline BAF for an organic or inorganic chemical derived from a field study of acceptable quality.
B. A predicted baseline BAF for an organic chemical derived using field-measured BSAFs of acceptable quality.
C. A predicted baseline BAF for an organic or inorganic chemical derived from a BCF measured in a laboratory study of acceptable quality and a FCM.
D. A predicted baseline BAF for an organic chemical derived from a KOW of acceptable quality and a FCM.
For comparative purposes, baseline BAFs should be derived for each chemical by as many of the four methods as available data allow.
V. Calculation of Baseline BAFs for Organic ChemicalsA. Lipid Normalization. 1. It is assumed that BAFs and BCFs for organic chemicals can be extrapolated on the basis of percent lipid from one tissue to another and from one aquatic species to another in most cases.
2. Because BAFs and BCFs for organic chemicals are related to the percent lipid, it does not make any difference whether the tissue sample is whole body or edible portion, but both the BAF (or BCF) and the percent lipid must be determined for the same tissue. The percent lipid of the tissue should be measured during the BAF or BCF study, but in some cases it can be reliably estimated from measurements on tissue from other organisms. If percent lipid is not reported for the test organisms in the original study, it may be obtained from the author; or, in the case of a laboratory study, lipid data for the same or a comparable laboratory population of test organisms that were used in the original study may be used.
3. The lipid-normalized concentration, Cl, of a chemical in tissue is defined using the following equation:
Where: CB = concentration of the organic chemical in the tissue of aquatic biota (either whole organism or specified tissue) (µg/g). fl = fraction of the tissue that is lipid.B. Bioavailability. By definition, baseline BAFs and BCFs for organic chemicals, whether measured or predicted are based on the concentration of the chemical that is freely dissolved in the ambient water in order to account for bioavailability. For the purposes of this Guidance in this part, the relationship between the total concentration of the chemical in the water (i.e., that which is freely dissolved plus that which is sorbed to particulate organic carbon or to dissolved organic carbon) to the freely dissolved concentration of the chemical in the ambient water shall be calculated using the following equation:
Where: C fdw = freely dissolved concentration of the organic chemical in the ambient water; C tw = total concentration of the organic chemical in the ambient water; ffd = fraction of the total chemical in the ambient water that is freely dissolved.The fraction of the total chemical in the ambient water that is freely dissolved, ffd, shall be calculated using the following equation:
Where: DOC = concentration of dissolved organic carbon, kg of dissolved organic carbon/L of water. KOW = octanol-water partition coefficient of the chemical. POC = concentration of particulate organic carbon, kg of particulate organic carbon/L of water.C. Food-Chain Multiplier. In the absence of a field-measured BAF or a predicted BAF derived from a BSAF, a FCM shall be used to calculate the baseline BAF for trophic levels 3 and 4 from a laboratory-measured or predicted BCF. For an organic chemical, the FCM used shall be derived from Table B-1 using the chemical's log KOW and linear interpolation. A FCM greater than 1.0 applies to most organic chemicals with a log KOW of four or more. The trophic level used shall take into account the age or size of the fish species consumed by the human, avian or mammalian predator because, for some species of fish, the young are in trophic level 3 whereas the adults are in trophic level 4.
D. Calculation of a Baseline BAF from a Field-Measured BAF. A baseline BAF shall be calculated from a field-measured BAF of acceptable quality using the following equation:
Where: BAF tT = BAF based on total concentration in tissue and water. fl = fraction of the tissue that is lipid. ffd = fraction of the total chemical that is freely dissolved in the ambient water. The trophic level to which the baseline BAF applies is the same as the trophic level of the organisms used in the determination of the field-measured BAF. For each trophic level, a species mean measured baseline BAF shall be calculated as the geometric mean if more than one measured baseline BAF is available for a given species. For each trophic level, the geometric mean of the species mean measured baseline BAFs shall be calculated. If a baseline BAF based on a measured BAF is available for either trophic level 3 or 4, but not both, a measured baseline BAF for the other trophic level shall be calculated using the ratio of the FCMs that are obtained by linear interpolation from Table B-1 for the chemical.E. Calculation of a Baseline BAF from a Field-Measured BSAF. 1. A baseline BAF for organic chemical “i” shall be calculated from a field-measured BSAF of acceptable quality using the following equation:
Where: (BSAF)i = BSAF for chemical “i”. (BSAF)r = BSAF for the reference chemical “r”. (KOW)i = octanol-water partition coefficient for chemical “i”. (KOW)r = octanol-water partition coefficient for the reference chemical “r”.2. A BSAF shall be calculated using the following equation:
Where: Ct = the lipid-normalized concentration of the chemical in tissue. CSOC = the organic carbon-normalized concentration of the chemical in sediment.3. The organic carbon-normalized concentration of a chemical in sediment, CSOC, shall be calculated using the following equation:
Where: CS = concentration of chemical in sediment (µg/g sediment). fOC = fraction of the sediment that is organic carbon.4. Predicting BAFs from BSAFs requires data from a steady-state (or near steady-state) condition between sediment and ambient water for both a reference chemical “r” with a field-measured BAFl fd and other chemicals “n = i” for which BSAFs are to be determined.
5. The trophic level to which the baseline BAF applies is the same as the trophic level of the organisms used in the determination of the BSAF. For each trophic level, a species mean baseline BAF shall be calculated as the geometric mean if more than one baseline BAF is predicted from BSAFs for a given species. For each trophic level, the geometric mean of the species mean baseline BAFs derived using BSAFs shall be calculated.
6. If a baseline BAF based on a measured BSAF is available for either trophic level 3 or 4, but not both, a baseline BAF for the other trophic level shall be calculated using the ratio of the FCMs that are obtained by linear interpolation from Table B-1 for the chemical.
F. Calculation of a Baseline BAF from a Laboratory-Measured BCF. A baseline BAF for trophic level 3 and a baseline BAF for trophic level 4 shall be calculated from a laboratory-measured BCF of acceptable quality and a FCM using the following equation:
Where: BCF tT = BCF based on total concentration in tissue and water. fl = fraction of the tissue that is lipid. ffd = fraction of the total chemical in the test water that is freely dissolved. FCM = the food-chain multiplier obtained from Table B-1 by linear interpolation for trophic level 3 or 4, as necessary. For each trophic level, a species mean baseline BAF shall be calculated as the geometric mean if more than one baseline BAF is predicted from laboratory-measured BCFs for a given species. For each trophic level, the geometric mean of the species mean baseline BAFs based on laboratory-measured BCFs shall be calculated.G. Calculation of a Baseline BAF from an Octanol-Water Partition Coefficient. A baseline BAF for trophic level 3 and a baseline BAF for trophic level 4 shall be calculated from a KOW of acceptable quality and a FCM using the following equation:
Baseline BAF = (FCM) (predicted baseline BCF) = (FCM) (KOW)
Where: FCM = the food-chain multiplier obtained from Table B-1 by linear interpolation for trophic level 3 or 4, as necessary. KOW = octanol-water partition coefficient. VI. Human Health and Wildlife BAFs for Organic ChemicalsA. To calculate human health and wildlife BAFs for an organic chemical, the KOW of the chemical shall be used with a POC concentration of 0.00000004 kg/L and a DOC concentration of 0.000002 kg/L to yield the fraction freely dissolved:
B. The human health BAFs for an organic chemical shall be calculated using the following equations:
For trophic level 3:
For trophic level 4:
Where:0.0182 and 0.0310 are the standardized fraction lipid values for trophic levels 3 and 4, respectively, that are used to derive human health criteria and values for the GLI.
C. The wildlife BAFs for an organic chemical shall be calculated using the following equations:
For trophic level 3:
For trophic level 4:
Where:0.0646 and 0.1031 are the standardized fraction lipid values for trophic levels 3 and 4, respectively, that are used to derive wildlife criteria for the GLI.
VII. Human Health and Wildlife BAFs for Inorganic ChemicalsA. For inorganic chemicals, the baseline BAFs for trophic levels 3 and 4 are both assumed to equal the BCF determined for the chemical with fish, i.e., the FCM is assumed to be 1 for both trophic levels 3 and 4. However, a FCM greater than 1 might be applicable to some metals, such as mercury, if, for example, an organometallic form of the metal biomagnifies.
B. BAFs for Human Health Criteria and Values.
1. Measured BAFs and BCFs used to determine human health BAFs for inorganic chemicals shall be based on edible tissue (e.g., muscle) of freshwater fish unless it is demonstrated that whole-body BAFs or BCFs are similar to edible-tissue BAFs or BCFs. BCFs and BAFs based on measurements of aquatic plants and invertebrates should not be used in the derivation of human health criteria and values.
2. If one or more field-measured baseline BAFs for an inorganic chemical are available from studies conducted in the Great Lakes System with the muscle of fish:
a. For each trophic level, a species mean measured baseline BAF shall be calculated as the geometric mean if more than one measured BAF is available for a given species; and
b. For each trophic level, the geometric mean of the species mean measured baseline BAFs shall be used as the human health BAF for that chemical.
3. If an acceptable measured baseline BAF is not available for an inorganic chemical and one or more acceptable edible-portion laboratory-measured BCFs are available for the chemical, a predicted baseline BAF shall be calculated by multiplying the geometric mean of the BCFs times a FCM. The FCM will be 1.0 unless chemical-specific biomagnification data support using a multiplier other than 1.0. The predicted baseline BAF shall be used as the human health BAF for that chemical.
C. BAFs for Wildlife Criteria.
1. Measured BAFs and BCFs used to determine wildlife BAFs for inorganic chemicals shall be based on whole-body freshwater fish and invertebrate data unless it is demonstrated that edible-tissue BAFs or BCFs are similar to whole-body BAFs or BCFs.
2. If one or more field-measured baseline BAFs for an inorganic chemical are available from studies conducted in the Great Lakes System with whole body of fish or invertebrates:
a. For each trophic level, a species mean measured baseline BAF shall be calculated as the geometric mean if more than one measured BAF is available for a given species.
b. For each trophic level, the geometric mean of the species mean measured baseline BAFs shall be used as the wildlife BAF for that chemical.
3. If an acceptable measured baseline BAF is not available for an inorganic chemical and one or more acceptable whole-body laboratory-measured BCFs are available for the chemical, a predicted baseline BAF shall be calculated by multiplying the geometric mean of the BCFs times a FCM. The FCM will be 1.0 unless chemical-specific biomagnification data support using a multiplier other than 1.0. The predicted baseline BAF shall be used as the wildlife BAF for that chemical.
VIII. Final ReviewFor both organic and inorganic chemicals, human health and wildlife BAFs for both trophic levels shall be reviewed for consistency with all available data concerning the bioaccumulation, bioconcentration, and metabolism of the chemical. For example, information concerning octanol-water partitioning, molecular size, or other physicochemical properties that might enhance or inhibit bioaccumulation should be considered for organic chemicals. BAFs derived in accordance with this methodology should be modified if changes are justified by available data.
IX. Literature CitedASTM. 1990. Standard Practice for Conducting Bioconcentration Tests with Fishes and Saltwater Bivalve Molluscs. Standard E 1022. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA.
Table B-1 - Food-Chain Multipliers for Trophic Levels 2, 3 & 4
Log KOW | Trophic level 2 | Trophic 1 level 3 | Trophic level 4 |
---|---|---|---|
2.0 | 1.000 | 1.005 | 1.000 |
2.5 | 1.000 | 1.010 | 1.002 |
3.0 | 1.000 | 1.028 | 1.007 |
3.1 | 1.000 | 1.034 | 1.007 |
3.2 | 1.000 | 1.042 | 1.009 |
3.3 | 1.000 | 1.053 | 1.012 |
3.4 | 1.000 | 1.067 | 1.014 |
3.5 | 1.000 | 1.083 | 1.019 |
3.6 | 1.000 | 1.103 | 1.023 |
3.7 | 1.000 | 1.128 | 1.033 |
3.8 | 1.000 | 1.161 | 1.042 |
3.9 | 1.000 | 1.202 | 1.054 |
4.0 | 1.000 | 1.253 | 1.072 |
4.1 | 1.000 | 1.315 | 1.096 |
4.2 | 1.000 | 1.380 | 1.130 |
4.3 | 1.000 | 1.491 | 1.178 |
4.4 | 1.000 | 1.614 | 1.242 |
4.5 | 1.000 | 1.766 | 1.334 |
4.6 | 1.000 | 1.950 | 1.459 |
4.7 | 1.000 | 2.175 | 1.633 |
4.8 | 1.000 | 2.452 | 1.871 |
4.9 | 1.000 | 2.780 | 2.193 |
5.0 | 1.000 | 3.181 | 2.612 |
5.1 | 1.000 | 3.643 | 3.162 |
5.2 | 1.000 | 4.188 | 3.873 |
5.3 | 1.000 | 4.803 | 4.742 |
5.4 | 1.000 | 5.502 | 5.821 |
5.5 | 1.000 | 6.266 | 7.079 |
5.6 | 1.000 | 7.096 | 8.551 |
5.7 | 1.000 | 7.962 | 10.209 |
5.8 | 1.000 | 8.841 | 12.050 |
5.9 | 1.000 | 9.716 | 13.964 |
6.0 | 1.000 | 10.556 | 15.996 |
6.1 | 1.000 | 11.337 | 17.783 |
6.2 | 1.000 | 12.064 | 19.907 |
6.3 | 1.000 | 12.691 | 21.677 |
6.4 | 1.000 | 13.228 | 23.281 |
6.5 | 1.000 | 13.662 | 24.604 |
6.6 | 1.000 | 13.980 | 25.645 |
6.7 | 1.000 | 14.223 | 26.363 |
6.8 | 1.000 | 14.355 | 26.669 |
6.9 | 1.000 | 14.388 | 26.669 |
7.0 | 1.000 | 14.305 | 26.242 |
7.1 | 1.000 | 14.142 | 25.468 |
7.2 | 1.000 | 13.852 | 24.322 |
7.3 | 1.000 | 13.474 | 22.856 |
7.4 | 1.000 | 12.987 | 21.038 |
7.5 | 1.000 | 12.517 | 18.967 |
7.6 | 1.000 | 11.708 | 16.749 |
7.7 | 1.000 | 10.914 | 14.388 |
7.8 | 1.000 | 10.069 | 12.050 |
7.9 | 1.000 | 9.162 | 9.840 |
8.0 | 1.000 | 8.222 | 7.798 |
8.1 | 1.000 | 7.278 | 6.012 |
8.2 | 1.000 | 6.361 | 4.519 |
8.3 | 1.000 | 5.489 | 3.311 |
8.4 | 1.000 | 4.683 | 2.371 |
8.5 | 1.000 | 3.949 | 1.663 |
8.6 | 1.000 | 3.296 | 1.146 |
8.7 | 1.000 | 2.732 | 0.778 |
8.8 | 1.000 | 2.246 | 0.521 |
8.9 | 1.000 | 1.837 | 0.345 |
9.0 | 1.000 | 1.493 | 0.226 |
1 The FCMs for trophic level 3 are the geometric mean of the FCMs for sculpin and alewife.