Appendix F to Part 52 - Design Certification Rule for the APR1400 Design
10:2.0.1.1.2.8.62.3.8 : Appendix F
Appendix F to Part 52 - Design Certification Rule for the APR1400
Design I. Introduction
Appendix F constitutes the standard design certification for the
Advanced Power Reactor 1400 (APR1400) design, in accordance with 10
CFR part 52, subpart B. The applicant for certification of the
APR1400 design is Korea Electric Power Corporation and Korea Hydro
& Nuclear Power Co., Ltd. (KEPCO/KHNP).
II. Definitions
A. Generic design control document (generic DCD) means
the document containing the Tier 1 and Tier 2 information
(including the technical and topical reports referenced in Chapter
1) and generic technical specifications that is incorporated by
reference into this appendix.
B. Generic technical specifications (generic TS) means
the information required by 10 CFR 50.36 and 50.36a for the portion
of the plant that is within the scope of this appendix.
C. Plant-specific DCD means that portion of the combined
license (COL) final safety analysis report that sets forth both the
generic DCD information and any plant-specific changes to generic
DCD information.
D. Tier 1 means the portion of the design-related
information contained in the generic DCD that is approved and
certified by this appendix (Tier 1 information). The design
descriptions, interface requirements, and site parameters are
derived from Tier 2 information. Tier 1 information includes:
1. Definitions and general provisions;
2. Design descriptions;
3. Inspections, tests, analyses, and acceptance criteria
(ITAAC);
4. Significant site parameters; and
5. Significant interface requirements.
E. Tier 2 means the portion of the design-related
information contained in the generic DCD that is approved but not
certified by this appendix (Tier 2 information). Compliance with
Tier 2 is required, but generic changes to and plant-specific
departures from Tier 2 are governed by Section VIII of this
appendix. Compliance with Tier 2 provides a sufficient, but not the
only acceptable, method for complying with Tier 1. Compliance
methods differing from Tier 2 must satisfy the change process in
Section VIII of this appendix. Regardless of these differences, an
applicant or licensee must meet the requirement in paragraph III.B
of this appendix to reference Tier 2 when referencing Tier 1. Tier
2 information includes:
1. Information required by § 52.47(a) and (c), with the
exception of generic TS and conceptual design information;
2. Supporting information on the inspections, tests, and
analyses that will be performed to demonstrate that the acceptance
criteria in the ITAAC have been met; and
3. COL Items (COL license information), which identify certain
matters that must be addressed in the site-specific portion of the
final safety analysis report by an applicant who references this
appendix. These items constitute information requirements but are
not the only acceptable set of information in the final safety
analysis report. An applicant may depart from or omit these items,
provided that the departure or omission is identified and justified
in the final safety analysis report. After issuance of a
construction permit or COL, these items are not requirements for
the licensee unless such items are restated in the final safety
analysis report.
F. Departure from a method of evaluation described in the
plant-specific DCD used in establishing the design bases or in the
safety analyses means:
1. Changing any of the elements of the method described in the
plant-specific DCD unless the results of the analysis are
conservative or essentially the same; or
2. Changing from a method described in the plant-specific DCD to
another method unless that method has been approved by the NRC for
the intended application.
G. All other terms in this appendix have the meaning set out in
10 CFR 50.2, 10 CFR 52.1, or Section 11 of the Atomic Energy Act of
1954, as amended, as applicable.
III. Scope and Contents
A. Incorporation by reference approval. The APR1400 material is
approved for incorporation by reference by the Director of the
Office of the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part
51. You may obtain copies of the generic DCD from Yun-Ho Kim,
President, KHNP Central Research Institute, 70, 1312-gil,
Yuseong-daero, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, 34101, Korea. You can view the
generic DCD online in the NRC Library at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. In ADAMS, search
under ADAMS Accession No. ML18228A667. If you do not have access to
ADAMS or if you have problems accessing documents located in ADAMS,
contact the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1-800-397-4209, at 301-415-3747, or by email at
[email protected]. Copies of this document are available
for examination and copying at the NRC's PDR located at Room
O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
Maryland 20852. Copies are also available for examination at the
NRC Library located at Two White Flint North, 11545 Rockville Pike,
Rockville, Maryland 20852, telephone: 301-415-5610, email:
[email protected]. All approved material is available
for inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call 202-741-6030 or go to
https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
1. Korea Electric Power Corporation and Korea Hydro & Nuclear
Power Co, Ltd
a. APR1400 Design Control Document Tier 1
(APR1400-K-X-IT-14001-NP), Revision 3 (August 2018).
b. APR1400 Design Control Document Tier 2
(APR1400-K-X-FS-14002-NP), Revision 3 (August 2018), including:
i. Chapter 1, Introduction and General Description of the
Plant.
ii. Chapter 2, Site Characteristics.
iii. Chapter 3, Design of Structures, Systems, Components, and
Equipment.
iv. Chapter 4, Reactor.
v. Chapter 5, Reactor Coolant System and Connecting Systems.
vi. Chapter 6, Engineered Safety Features.
vii. Chapter 7, Instrumentation and Controls.
viii. Chapter 8, Electric Power.
ix. Chapter 9, Auxiliary Systems.
x. Chapter 10, Steam and Power Conversion System.
xi. Chapter 11, Radioactive Waste Management.
xii. Chapter 12, Radiation Protection.
xiii. Chapter 13, Conduct of Operations.
xiv. Chapter 14, Verification Programs.
xv. Chapter 15, Transient and Accident Analyses.
xvi. Chapter 16, Technical Specifications.
xvii. Chapter 17, Quality Assurance and Reliability
Assurance.
xviii. Chapter 18, Human Factors Engineering.
xix. Chapter 19, Probabilistic Risk Assessment and Severe
Accident Evaluation.
c. APR1400-E-B-NR-16001-NP, Evaluation of Main Steam and
Feedwater Piping Applied to the Graded Approach for the APR1400,
Rev. 0 (July 2017).
d. APR1400-E-B-NR-16002-NP, Evaluation of Safety Injection and
Shutdown Cooling Piping Applied to the Graded Approach for the
APR1400, Rev. 1 (May 2018).
e. APR1400-E-I-NR-14001-NP, Human Factors Engineering Program
Plan, Rev. 4 (July 2018).
f. APR1400-E-I-NR-14002-NP, Operating Experience Review
Implementation Plan, Rev. 2 (January 2018).
g. APR1400-E-I-NR-14003-NP, Functional Requirements Analysis and
Function Allocation Implementation Plan, Rev. 2 (January 2018).
h. APR1400-E-I-NR-14004-NP, Task Analysis Implementation Plan,
Rev. 3 (May 2018).
i. APR1400-E-I-NR-14006-NP, Treatment of Important Human Actions
Implementation Plan, Rev. 3 (May 2018).
j. APR1400-E-I-NR-14007-NP, Human-System Interface Design
Implementation Plan, Rev. 3 (May 2018).
k. APR1400-E-I-NR-14008-NP, Human Factors Verification and
Validation Implementation Plan, Rev. 3 (May 2018).
l. APR1400-E-I-NR-14010-NP, Human Factors Verification and
Validation Scenarios, Rev. 2 (January 2018).
m. APR1400-E-I-NR-14011-NP, Basic Human-System Interface, Rev. 3
(May 2018).
n. APR1400-E-I-NR-14012-NP, Style Guide, Rev. 2 (January
2018).
o. APR1400-E-J-NR-14001-NP, Component Interface Module, Rev. 1
(March 2017).
p. APR1400-E-J-NR-17001-NP, Secure Development and Operational
Environment for APR1400 Computer-Based I&C Safety Systems, Rev.
0 (September 2017).
q. APR1400-E-N-NR-14001-NP, Design Features To Address GSI-191,
Rev. 3 (February 2018).
r. APR1400-E-P-NR-14005-NP, Evaluations and Design Enhancements
To Incorporate Lessons Learned from Fukushima Dai-Ichi Nuclear
Accident, Rev. 2 (July 2017).
s. APR1400-E-S-NR-14004-NP, Evaluation of Effects of HRHF
Response Spectra on SSCs, Rev. 3 (December 2017).
t. APR1400-E-S-NR-14005-NP, Evaluation of
Structure-Soil-Structure Interaction (SSSI) Effects, Rev. 2
(December 2017).
u. APR1400-E-S-NR-14006-NP, Stability Check for NI Common
Basemat, Rev. 5 (May 2018).
v. APR1400-E-X-NR-14001-NP, Equipment Qualification Program,
Rev. 4 (July 2018).
w. APR1400-F-A-NR-14001-NP, Small Break LOCA Evaluation Model,
Rev. 1 (March 2017).
x. APR1400-F-A-NR-14003-NP, Post-LOCA Long Term Cooling
Evaluation Model, Rev. 1 (March 2017).
y. APR1400-F-A-TR-12004-NP-A, Realistic Evaluation Methodology
for Large-Break LOCA of the APR1400 (August 2018).
z. APR1400-F-C-NR-14001-NP, CPC Setpoint Analysis Methodology
for APR1400, Rev. 3 (June 2018).
aa. APR1400-F-C-NR-14002-NP, Functional Design Requirements for
a Core Operating Limit Supervisory System for APR1400, Rev. 1
(February 2017).
ab. APR1400-F-C-NR-14003-NP, Functional Design Requirements for
a Core Protection Calculator System for APR1400, Rev. 1 (March
2017).
ac. APR1400-F-C-TR-12002-NP-A, KCE-1 Critical Heat Flux
Correlation for PLUS7 Thermal Design (April 2017).
ad. APR1400-F-M-TR-13001-NP-A, PLUS7 Fuel Design for the APR1400
(August 2018).
ae. APR1400-H-N-NR-14005-NP, Summary Stress Report for Primary
Piping, Rev. 2 (September 2016).
af. APR1400-H-N-NR-14012-NP, Mechanical Analysis for New and
Spent Fuel Storage Racks, Rev. 3 (August 2017).
ag. APR1400-K-I-NR-14005-NP, Staffing and Qualifications
Implementation Plan, Rev. 1 (February 2017).
ah. APR1400-K-I-NR-14009-NP, Design Implementation Plan, Rev. 1
(February 2017).
ai. APR1400-K-Q-TR-11005-NP-A, KHNP Quality Assurance Program
Description (QAPD) for the APR1400 Design Certification, Rev. 2
(October 2016).
aj. APR1400-Z-A-NR-14006-NP, Non-LOCA Safety Analysis
Methodology, Rev. 1 (February 2017).
ak. APR1400-Z-A-NR-14007-NP, Mass and Energy Release
Methodologies for LOCA and MSLB, Rev. 2 (May 2018).
al. APR1400-Z-A-NR-14011-NP, Criticality Analysis of New and
Spent Fuel Storage Racks, Rev. 3 (May 2018).
am. APR1400-Z-A-NR-14019-NP, CCF Coping Analysis, Rev. 3 (July
2018).
an. APR1400-Z-J-NR-14001-NP, Safety I&C System, Rev. 3 (May
2018).
ao. APR1400-Z-J-NR-14002-NP, Diversity and Defense-in-Depth,
Rev. 3 (May 2018).
ap. APR1400-Z-J-NR-14003-NP, Software Program Manual, Rev. 3
(May 2018).
aq. APR1400-Z-J-NR-14004-NP, Uncertainty Methodology and
Application for Instrumentation, Rev. 2 (January 2018).
ar. APR1400-Z-J-NR-14005-NP, Setpoint Methodology for
Safety-Related Instrumentation, Rev. 2 (January 2018).
as. APR1400-Z-J-NR-14012-NP, Control System CCF Analysis, Rev. 3
(May 2018).
at. APR1400-Z-J-NR-14013-NP, Response Time Analysis of Safety
I&C System, Rev. 2 (January 2018).
au. APR1400-Z-M-NR-14008-NP, Pressure-Temperature Limits
Methodology for RCS Heatup and Cooldown, Rev. 1 (January 2018).
av. APR1400-Z-M-TR-12003-NP-A, Fluidic Device Design for the
APR1400 (April 2017).
2. Combustion Engineering, Inc.
a. CEN-310-NP-A, CPC and Methodology Changes for the CPC
Improvement Program (April 1986).
b. CEN-312-NP, Overview Description of the Core Operating Limit
Supervisory System (COLSS), Rev. 01-NP (November 1986).
3. Westinghouse
a. WCAP-10697-NP-A, Common Qualified Platform Topical Report,
Rev. 3 (February 2013).
b. WCAP-17889-NP (APR1400-A-N-NR-17001-NP), Validation of SCALE
6.1.2 with 238-Group ENDF/B-VII.0 Cross Section Library for APR1400
Design Certification, Rev. 0 (June 2014).
B. An applicant or licensee referencing this appendix, in
accordance with Section IV of this appendix, shall incorporate by
reference and comply with the requirements of this appendix except
as otherwise provided in this appendix.
C. If there is a conflict between Tier 1 and Tier 2 of the DCD,
then Tier 1 controls.
D. If there is a conflict between the generic DCD and either the
application for the design certification of the APR1400 design or
the NUREG, “Final Safety Evaluation Report Related to Certification
of the APR1400 Standard Design,” then the generic DCD controls.
E. Design activities for structures, systems, and components
that are entirely outside the scope of this appendix may be
performed using site characteristics, provided the design
activities do not affect the DCD or conflict with the interface
requirements.
IV. Additional Requirements and Restrictions
A. An applicant for a COL that wishes to reference this appendix
shall, in addition to complying with the requirements of §§ 52.77,
52.79, and 52.80, comply with the following requirements:
1. Incorporate by reference, as part of its application, this
appendix.
2. Include, as part of its application:
a. A plant-specific DCD containing the same type of information
and using the same organization and numbering as the generic DCD
for the APR1400 design, either by including or incorporating by
reference the generic DCD information, and as modified and
supplemented by the applicant's exemptions and departures;
b. The reports on departures from and updates to the
plant-specific DCD required by paragraph X.B of this appendix;
c. Plant-specific TS, consisting of the generic and
site-specific TS that are required by 10 CFR 50.36 and 50.36a;
d. Information demonstrating that the site characteristics fall
within the site parameters and that the interface requirements have
been met;
e. Information that addresses the COL items; and
f. Information required by § 52.47(a) that is not within the
scope of this appendix.
3. Include, in the plant-specific DCD, the sensitive,
unclassified, non-safeguards information (including proprietary
information and security-related information) and safeguards
information referenced in the APR1400 generic DCD.
4. Include, as part of its application, a demonstration that an
entity other than KEPCO/KHNP is qualified to supply the APR1400
design, unless KEPCO/KHNP supplies the design for the applicant's
use.
B. The Commission reserves the right to determine in what manner
this appendix may be referenced by an applicant for a construction
permit or operating license under 10 CFR part 50.
V. Applicable Regulations
A. Except as indicated in paragraph B of this section, the
regulations that apply to the APR1400 design are in 10 CFR parts
20, 50, 52, 73, and 100, codified as of September 19, 2019, that
are applicable and technically relevant, as described in the final
safety evaluation report.
B. The APR1400 design is exempt from portions of the following
regulations:
1. Paragraph (f)(2)(iv) of 10 CFR 50.34 - Contents of
Applications: Technical Information - codified as of September 19,
2019.
VI. Issue Resolution
A. The Commission has determined that the structures, systems,
and components and design features of the APR1400 design comply
with the provisions of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended,
and the applicable regulations identified in Section V of this
appendix; and therefore, provide adequate protection to the health
and safety of the public. A conclusion that a matter is resolved
includes the finding that additional or alternative structures,
systems, and components, design features, design criteria, testing,
analyses, acceptance criteria, or justifications are not necessary
for the APR1400 design.
B. The Commission considers the following matters resolved
within the meaning of § 52.63(a)(5) in subsequent proceedings for
issuance of a COL, amendment of a COL, or renewal of a COL,
proceedings held under § 52.103, and enforcement proceedings
involving plants referencing this appendix:
1. All nuclear safety issues associated with the information in
the final safety evaluation report, Tier 1, Tier 2, and the
rulemaking record for certification of the APR1400 design, with the
exception of generic TS and other operational requirements;
2. All nuclear safety and safeguards issues associated with the
referenced information in the 53 non-public documents in Tables
1.6-1 and 1.6-2 of Tier 2 of the DCD, which contain sensitive
unclassified non-safeguards information (including proprietary
information and security-related information) and safeguards
information and which, in context, are intended as requirements in
the generic DCD for the APR1400 design;
3. All generic changes to the DCD under and in compliance with
the change processes in paragraphs VIII.A.1 and VIII.B.1 of this
appendix;
4. All exemptions from the DCD under and in compliance with the
change processes in paragraphs VIII.A.4 and VIII.B.4 of this
appendix, but only for that plant;
5. All departures from the DCD that are approved by license
amendment, but only for that plant;
6. Except as provided in paragraph VIII.B.5.f of this appendix,
all departures from Tier 2 under and in compliance with the change
processes in paragraph VIII.B.5 of this appendix that do not
require prior NRC approval, but only for that plant; and
7. All environmental issues concerning severe accident
mitigation design alternatives associated with the information in
the NRC's environmental assessment for the APR1400 design (ADAMS
Accession No. ML18306A607) and APR1400-E-P-NR-14006, Revision 2,
“Severe Accident Mitigation Design Alternatives (SAMDAs) for the
APR1400” (ML18235A158) for plants referencing this appendix whose
site characteristics fall within those site parameters specified in
APR1400-E-P-NR-14006.
C. The Commission does not consider operational requirements for
an applicant or licensee who references this appendix to be matters
resolved within the meaning of § 52.63(a)(5). The Commission
reserves the right to require operational requirements for an
applicant or licensee who references this appendix by rule,
regulation, order, or license condition.
D. Except under the change processes in Section VIII of this
appendix, the Commission may not require an applicant or licensee
who references this appendix to:
1. Modify structures, systems, components, or design features as
described in the generic DCD;
2. Provide additional or alternative structures, systems,
components, or design features not discussed in the generic DCD;
or
3. Provide additional or alternative design criteria, testing,
analyses, acceptance criteria, or justification for structures,
systems, components, or design features discussed in the generic
DCD.
E. The NRC will specify, at an appropriate time, the procedures
to be used by an interested person who wishes to review portions of
the design certification or references containing safeguards
information or sensitive unclassified non-safeguards information
(including proprietary information, such as trade secrets and
commercial or financial information obtained from a person that are
privileged or confidential (10 CFR 2.390 and 10 CFR part 9), and
security-related information), for the purpose of participating in
the hearing required by § 52.85, the hearing provided under §
52.103, or in any other proceeding relating to this appendix, in
which interested persons have a right to request an adjudicatory
hearing.
VII. Duration of This Appendix
This appendix may be referenced for a period of 15 years from
September 19, 2019, except as provided for in §§ 52.55(b) and
52.57(b). This appendix remains valid for an applicant or licensee
who references this appendix until the application is withdrawn or
the license expires, including any period of extended operation
under a renewed license.
VIII. Processes for Changes and Departures A. Tier 1 Information
1. Generic changes to Tier 1 information are governed by the
requirements in § 52.63(a)(1).
2. Generic changes to Tier 1 information are applicable to all
applicants or licensees who reference this appendix, except those
for which the change has been rendered technically irrelevant by
action taken under paragraphs A.3 or A.4 of this section.
3. Departures from Tier 1 information that are required by the
Commission through plant-specific orders are governed by the
requirements in § 52.63(a)(4).
4. Exemptions from Tier 1 information are governed by the
requirements in §§ 52.63(b)(1) and 52.98(f). The Commission will
deny a request for an exemption from Tier 1, if it finds that the
design change will result in a significant decrease in the level of
safety otherwise provided by the design.
B. Tier 2 Information
1. Generic changes to Tier 2 information are governed by the
requirements in § 52.63(a)(1).
2. Generic changes to Tier 2 information are applicable to all
applicants or licensees who reference this appendix, except those
for which the change has been rendered technically irrelevant by
action taken under paragraphs B.3, B.4, or B.5, of this
section.
3. The Commission may not require new requirements on Tier 2
information by plant-specific order, while this appendix is in
effect under § 52.55 or § 52.61, unless:
a. A modification is necessary to secure compliance with the
Commission's regulations applicable and in effect at the time this
appendix was approved, as set forth in Section V of this appendix,
or to ensure adequate protection of the public health and safety or
the common defense and security; and
b. Special circumstances as defined in 10 CFR 50.12(a) are
present.
4. An applicant or licensee who references this appendix may
request an exemption from Tier 2 information. The Commission may
grant such a request only if it determines that the exemption will
comply with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.12(a). The Commission
will deny a request for an exemption from Tier 2, if it finds that
the design change will result in a significant decrease in the
level of safety otherwise provided by the design. The granting of
an exemption to an applicant must be subject to litigation in the
same manner as other issues material to the license hearing. The
granting of an exemption to a licensee must be subject to an
opportunity for a hearing in the same manner as license
amendments.
5.a. An applicant or licensee who references this appendix may
depart from Tier 2 information, without prior NRC approval, unless
the proposed departure involves a change to or departure from Tier
1 information, or the TS, or requires a license amendment under
paragraph B.5.b or B.5.c of this section. When evaluating the
proposed departure, an applicant or licensee shall consider all
matters described in the plant-specific DCD.
b. A proposed departure from Tier 2, other than one affecting
resolution of a severe accident issue identified in the
plant-specific DCD or one affecting information required by §
52.47(a)(28) to address aircraft impacts, requires a license
amendment if it would:
(1) Result in more than a minimal increase in the frequency of
occurrence of an accident previously evaluated in the
plant-specific DCD;
(2) Result in more than a minimal increase in the likelihood of
occurrence of a malfunction of a structure, system, or component
important to safety and previously evaluated in the plant-specific
DCD;
(3) Result in more than a minimal increase in the consequences
of an accident previously evaluated in the plant-specific DCD;
(4) Result in more than a minimal increase in the consequences
of a malfunction of a structure, system, or component important to
safety previously evaluated in the plant-specific DCD;
(5) Create a possibility for an accident of a different type
than any evaluated previously in the plant-specific DCD;
(6) Create a possibility for a malfunction of a structure,
system, or component important to safety with a different result
than any evaluated previously in the plant-specific DCD;
(7) Result in a design-basis limit for a fission product barrier
as described in the plant-specific DCD being exceeded or altered;
or
(8) Result in a departure from a method of evaluation described
in the plant-specific DCD used in establishing the design bases or
in the safety analyses.
c. A proposed departure from Tier 2, affecting resolution of an
ex-vessel severe accident design feature identified in the
plant-specific DCD, requires a license amendment if:
(1) There is a substantial increase in the probability of an
ex-vessel severe accident such that a particular ex-vessel severe
accident previously reviewed and determined to be not credible
could become credible; or
(2) There is a substantial increase in the consequences to the
public of a particular ex-vessel severe accident previously
reviewed.
d. A proposed departure from Tier 2 information required by §
52.47(a)(28) to address aircraft impacts shall consider the effect
of the changed design feature or functional capability on the
original aircraft impact assessment required by 10 CFR 50.150(a).
The applicant or licensee shall describe, in the plant-specific
DCD, how the modified design features and functional capabilities
continue to meet the aircraft impact assessment requirements in 10
CFR 50.150(a)(1).
e. If a departure requires a license amendment under paragraph
B.5.b or B.5.c of this section, it is governed by 10 CFR 50.90.
f. A departure from Tier 2 information that is made under
paragraph B.5 of this section does not require an exemption from
this appendix.
g. A party to an adjudicatory proceeding for either the
issuance, amendment, or renewal of a license or for operation under
§ 52.103(a), who believes that an applicant or licensee who
references this appendix has not complied with paragraph VIII.B.5
of this appendix when departing from Tier 2 information, may
petition to admit into the proceeding such a contention. In
addition to complying with the general requirements of 10 CFR
2.309, the petition must demonstrate that the departure does not
comply with paragraph VIII.B.5 of this appendix. Further, the
petition must demonstrate that the change bears on an asserted
noncompliance with an ITAAC acceptance criterion in the case of a §
52.103 preoperational hearing, or that the change bears directly on
the amendment request in the case of a hearing on a license
amendment. Any other party may file a response. If, on the basis of
the petition and any response, the presiding officer determines
that a sufficient showing has been made, the presiding officer
shall certify the matter directly to the Commission for
determination of the admissibility of the contention. The
Commission may admit such a contention if it determines the
petition raises a genuine issue of material fact regarding
compliance with paragraph VIII.B.5 of this appendix.
C. Operational Requirements
1. Changes to APR1400 DC generic TS and other operational
requirements that were completely reviewed and approved in the
design certification rulemaking and do not require a change to a
design feature in the generic DCD are governed by the requirements
in 10 CFR 50.109. Changes that require a change to a design feature
in the generic DCD are governed by the requirements in paragraphs A
or B of this section.
2. Changes to APR1400 DC generic TS and other operational
requirements are applicable to all applicants who reference this
appendix, except those for which the change has been rendered
technically irrelevant by action taken under paragraphs C.3 or C.4
of this section.
3. The Commission may require plant-specific departures on
generic TS and other operational requirements that were completely
reviewed and approved, provided a change to a design feature in the
generic DCD is not required and special circumstances, as defined
in 10 CFR 2.335 are present. The Commission may modify or
supplement generic TS and other operational requirements that were
not completely reviewed and approved or require additional TS and
other operational requirements on a plant-specific basis, provided
a change to a design feature in the generic DCD is not
required.
4. An applicant who references this appendix may request an
exemption from the generic TS or other operational requirements.
The Commission may grant such a request only if it determines that
the exemption will comply with the requirements of § 52.7. The
granting of an exemption must be subject to litigation in the same
manner as other issues material to the license hearing.
5. A party to an adjudicatory proceeding for the issuance,
amendment, or renewal of a license, or for operation under §
52.103(a), who believes that an operational requirement approved in
the DCD or a TS derived from the generic TS must be changed, may
petition to admit such a contention into the proceeding. The
petition must comply with the general requirements of 10 CFR 2.309
and must demonstrate why special circumstances as defined in 10 CFR
2.335 are present, or demonstrate compliance with the Commission's
regulations in effect at the time this appendix was approved, as
set forth in Section V of this appendix. Any other party may file a
response to the petition. If, on the basis of the petition and any
response, the presiding officer determines that a sufficient
showing has been made, the presiding officer shall certify the
matter directly to the Commission for determination of the
admissibility of the contention. All other issues with respect to
the plant-specific TS or other operational requirements are subject
to a hearing as part of the licensing proceeding.
6. After issuance of a license, the generic TS have no further
effect on the plant-specific TS. Changes to the plant-specific TS
will be treated as license amendments under 10 CFR 50.90.
IX. [Reserved] X. Records and Reporting A. Records
1. The applicant for this appendix shall maintain a copy of the
generic DCD that includes all generic changes that are made to Tier
1 and Tier 2, and the generic TS and other operational
requirements. The applicant shall maintain the sensitive
unclassified non-safeguards information (including proprietary
information and security-related information) and safeguards
information referenced in the generic DCD for the period that this
appendix may be referenced, as specified in Section VII of this
appendix.
2. An applicant or licensee who references this appendix shall
maintain the plant-specific DCD to accurately reflect both generic
changes to the generic DCD and plant-specific departures made under
Section VIII of this appendix throughout the period of application
and for the term of the license (including any periods of
renewal).
3. An applicant or licensee who references this appendix shall
prepare and maintain written evaluations which provide the bases
for the determinations required by Section VIII of this appendix.
These evaluations must be retained throughout the period of
application and for the term of the license (including any periods
of renewal).
4.a. The applicant for the APR1400 design shall maintain a copy
of the aircraft impact assessment performed to comply with the
requirements of 10 CFR 50.150(a) for the term of the certification
(including any period of renewal).
b. An applicant or licensee who references this appendix shall
maintain a copy of the aircraft impact assessment performed to
comply with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.150(a) throughout the
pendency of the application and for the term of the license
(including any periods of renewal).
B. Reporting
1. An applicant or licensee who references this appendix shall
submit a report to the NRC containing a brief description of any
plant-specific departures from the DCD, including a summary of the
evaluation of each departure. This report must be filed in
accordance with the filing requirements applicable to reports in §
52.3.
2. An applicant or licensee who references this appendix shall
submit updates to its plant-specific DCD, which reflect the generic
changes to and plant-specific departures from the generic DCD made
under Section VIII of this appendix. These updates shall be filed
under the filing requirements applicable to final safety analysis
report updates in 10 CFR 50.71(e) and 52.3.
3. The reports and updates required by paragraphs X.B.1 and
X.B.2 of this appendix must be submitted as follows:
a. On the date that an application for a license referencing
this appendix is submitted, the application must include the report
and any updates to the generic DCD.
b. During the interval from the date of application for a
license to the date the Commission makes its finding required by §
52.103(g), the report must be submitted semi-annually. Updates to
the plant-specific DCD must be submitted annually and may be
submitted along with amendments to the application.
c. After the Commission makes the finding required by §
52.103(g), the reports and updates to the plant-specific DCD must
be submitted, along with updates to the site-specific portion of
the final safety analysis report for the facility, at the intervals
required by 10 CFR 50.59(d)(2) and 50.71(e)(4), respectively, or at
shorter intervals as specified in the license.
[84 FR 23452, May 22, 2019]