Subpart E—Project Selection
Sections
-
86.50
§ 86.50 Who ranks BIG Tier 2—National grant applications? -
86.51
§ 86.51 What criteria does the Service use to evaluate BIG Tier 2—National applications? -
86.52
§ 86.52 What does the Service consider when evaluating a project on the need for more or improved boating infrastructure? -
86.53
§ 86.53 What factors does the Service consider for benefits to eligible users that justify the cost? -
86.54
§ 86.54 What does the Service consider when evaluating a project on boater access to significant destinations and services that support transient boater travel? -
86.55
§ 86.55 What does the Service consider as a partner for the purposes of these ranking criteria? -
86.56
§ 86.56 What does the Service consider when evaluating a project that includes more than the minimum match? -
86.57
§ 86.57 What does the Service consider when evaluating contributions that a partner brings to a project? -
86.58
§ 86.58 What does the Service consider when evaluating a project for a physical component, technology, or technique that will improve eligible user access? -
86.59
§ 86.59 What does the Service consider when evaluating a project for innovative physical components, technology, or techniques that improve the BIG project? -
86.60
§ 86.60 What does the Service consider when evaluating a project for demonstrating a commitment to environmental compliance, sustainability, and stewardship? -
86.61
§ 86.61 What happens after the Director approves projects for funding?