Title 50

PART 86 SUBPART E

Subpart E - Project Selection

50:9.0.1.5.29.5.37.1SECTION 86.50
   86.50 Who ranks BIG Tier 2 - National grant applications
50:9.0.1.5.29.5.37.2SECTION 86.51
   86.51 What criteria does the Service use to evaluate BIG Tier 2 - National applications
50:9.0.1.5.29.5.37.3SECTION 86.52
   86.52 What does the Service consider when evaluating a project on the need for more or improved boating infrastructure
50:9.0.1.5.29.5.37.4SECTION 86.53
   86.53 What factors does the Service consider for benefits to eligible users that justify the cost
50:9.0.1.5.29.5.37.5SECTION 86.54
   86.54 What does the Service consider when evaluating a project on boater access to significant destinations and services that support transient boater travel
50:9.0.1.5.29.5.37.6SECTION 86.55
   86.55 What does the Service consider as a partner for the purposes of these ranking criteria
50:9.0.1.5.29.5.37.7SECTION 86.56
   86.56 What does the Service consider when evaluating a project that includes more than the minimum match
50:9.0.1.5.29.5.37.8SECTION 86.57
   86.57 What does the Service consider when evaluating contributions that a partner brings to a project
50:9.0.1.5.29.5.37.9SECTION 86.58
   86.58 What does the Service consider when evaluating a project for a physical component, technology, or technique that will improve eligible user access
50:9.0.1.5.29.5.37.10SECTION 86.59
   86.59 What does the Service consider when evaluating a project for innovative physical components, technology, or techniques that improve the BIG project
50:9.0.1.5.29.5.37.11SECTION 86.60
   86.60 What does the Service consider when evaluating a project for demonstrating a commitment to environmental compliance, sustainability, and stewardship
50:9.0.1.5.29.5.37.12SECTION 86.61
   86.61 What happens after the Director approves projects for funding