Subpart E—Project Selection

Sections

• 86.50
  § 86.50 Who ranks BIG Tier 2—National grant applications?
• 86.51
  § 86.51 What criteria does the Service use to evaluate BIG Tier 2—National applications?
• 86.52
  § 86.52 What does the Service consider when evaluating a project on the need for more or improved boating infrastructure?
• 86.53
  § 86.53 What factors does the Service consider for benefits to eligible users that justify the cost?
• 86.54
  § 86.54 What does the Service consider when evaluating a project on boater access to significant destinations and services that support transient boater travel?
• 86.55
  § 86.55 What does the Service consider as a partner for the purposes of these ranking criteria?
• 86.56
  § 86.56 What does the Service consider when evaluating a project that includes more than the minimum match?
• 86.57
  § 86.57 What does the Service consider when evaluating contributions that a partner brings to a project?
• 86.58
  § 86.58 What does the Service consider when evaluating a project for a physical component, technology, or technique that will improve eligible user access?
• 86.59
  § 86.59 What does the Service consider when evaluating a project for innovative physical components, technology, or techniques that improve the BIG project?
• 86.60
  § 86.60 What does the Service consider when evaluating a project for demonstrating a commitment to environmental compliance, sustainability, and stewardship?
• 86.61
  § 86.61 What happens after the Director approves projects for funding?