Appendix C to Part 75 - Missing Data Estimation Procedures
40:18.0.1.1.4.10.1.1.8 : Appendix C
Appendix C to Part 75 - Missing Data Estimation Procedures 1.
Parametric Monitoring Procedure for Missing SO2 Concentration or
NOX Emission Rate Data 1.1 Applicability
The owner or operator of any affected unit equipped with
post-combustion SO2 or NOX emission controls and SO2 pollutant
concentration monitors and/or NOX continuous emission monitoring
systems at the inlet and outlet of the emission control system may
apply to the Administrator for approval and certification of a
parametric, empirical, or process simulation method or model for
calculating substitute data for missing data periods. Such methods
may be used to parametrically estimate the removal efficiency of
the SO2 of postcombustion NOX emission controls which, with the
monitored inlet concentration or emission rate data, may be used to
estimate the average concentration of SO2 emissions or average
emission rate of NOX discharged to the atmosphere. After approval
by the Administrator, such method or model may be used for filling
in missing SO2 concentration or NOX emission rate data when data
from the outlet SO2 pollutant concentration monitor or outlet NOX
continuous emission monitoring system have been reported with an
annual monitor data availability of 90.0 percent or more.
Base the empirical and process simulation methods or models on
the fundamental chemistry and engineering principles involved in
the treatment of pollutant gas. On a case-by-case basis, the
Administrator may pre-certify commercially available process
simulation methods and models.
1.2 Petition Requirements
Continuously monitor, determine, and record hourly averages of
the estimated SO2 or NOX removal efficiency and of the parameters
specified below, at a minimum. The affected facility shall supply
additional parametric information where appropriate. Measure the
SO2 concentration or NOX emission rate, removal efficiency of the
add-on emission controls, and the parameters for at least 2160 unit
operating hours. Provide information for all expected operating
conditions and removal efficiencies. At least 4 evenly spaced data
points are required for a valid hourly average, except during
periods of calibration, maintenance, or quality assurance
activities, during which 2 data points per hour are sufficient. The
Administrator will review all applications on a case-by-case
basis.
1.2.1 Parameters for Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization System
1.2.1.1 Number of scrubber modules in operation.
1.2.1.2 Total slurry rate to each scrubber module (gal per
min).
1.2.1.3 In-line absorber pH of each scrubber module.
1.2.1.4 Pressure differential across each scrubber module
(inches of water column).
1.2.1.5 Unit load (MWe).
1.2.1.6 Inlet and outlet SO2 concentration as determined by the
monitor or missing data substitution procedures.
1.2.1.7 Percent solids in slurry for each scrubber module.
1.2.1.8 Any other parameters necessary to verify scrubber
removal efficiency, if the Administrator determines the parameters
above are not sufficient.
1.2.2 Parameters for Dry Flue Gas Desulfurization System
1.2.2.1 Number of scrubber modules in operation.
1.2.2.2 Atomizer slurry flow rate to each scrubber module (gal
per min).
1.2.2.3 Inlet and outlet temperature for each scrubber module
(°F).
1.2.2.4 Pressure differential across each scrubber module
(inches of water column).
1.2.2.5 Unit load (MWe).
1.2.2.6 Inlet and outlet SO2 concentration as determined by the
monitor or missing data substitution procedures.
1.2.2.7 Any other parameters necessary to verify scrubber
removal efficiency, if the Administrator determines the parameters
above are not sufficient.
1.2.3 Parameters for Other Flue Gas Desulfurization Systems
If SO2 control technologies other than wet or dry lime or
limestone scrubbing are selected for flue gas desulfurization, a
corresponding empirical correlation or process simulation
parametric method using appropriate parameters may be developed by
the owner or operator of the affected unit, and then reviewed and
approved or modified by the Administrator on a case-by-case
basis.
1.2.4 Parameters for Post-Combustion NOX Emission Controls
1.2.4.1 Inlet air flow rate to the unit (boiler) (mcf/hr).
1.2.4.2 Excess oxygen concentration of flue gas at stack outlet
(percent).
1.2.4.3 Carbon monoxide concentration of flue gas at stack
outlet (ppm).
1.2.4.4 Temperature of flue gas at outlet of the unit (°F).
1.2.4.5 Inlet and outlet NOX emission rate as determined by the
NOX continuous emission monitoring system or missing data
substitution procedures.
1.2.4.6 Any other parameters specific to the emission reduction
process necessary to verify the NOX control removal efficiency,
(e.g., reagent feedrate in gal/mi).
1.3 Correlation of Emissions With Parameters
Establish a method for correlating hourly averages of the
parameters identified above with the percent removal efficiency of
the SO2 or post-combustion NOX emission controls under varying unit
operating loads. Equations 1-7 in § 75.15 may be used to estimate
the percent removal efficiency of the SO2 emission controls on an
hourly basis.
Each parametric data substitution procedure should develop a
data correlation procedure to verify the performance of the SO2
emission controls or post-combustion NOX emission controls, along
with the SO2 pollutant concentration monitor and NOX continuous
emission monitoring system values for varying unit load ranges.
For NOX emission rate data, and wherever the performance of the
emission controls varies with the load, use the load range
procedure provided in section 2.2 of this appendix.
1.4 Calculations
1.4.1 Use the following equation to calculate substitute data
for filling in missing (outlet) SO2 pollutant concentration monitor
data.
Mo = Ic (1-E) (Eq. C-1) where, Mo = Substitute data for outlet SO2
concentration, ppm. Ic = Recorded inlet SO2 concentration, ppm. E =
Removal efficiency of SO2 emission controls as determined by the
correlation procedure described in section 1.3 of this appendix.
1.4.2 Use the following equation to calculate substitute data
for filling in missing (outlet) NOX emission rate data.
Mo = Ic (1-E) (Eq. C-2) where, Mo = Substitute data for outlet NOX
emission rate, lb/mmBtu. Ic = Recorded inlet NOX emission rate,
lb/mmBtu. E = Removal efficiency of post-combustion NOX emission
controls determined by the correlation procedure described in
section 1.3 of this appendix. 1.5 Missing Data
1.5.1 If both the inlet and the outlet SO2 pollutant
concentration monitors are unavailable simultaneously, use the
maximum inlet SO2 concentration recorded by the inlet SO2 pollutant
concentration monitor during the previous 720 quality-assured
monitor operating hours to substitute for the inlet SO2
concentration in equation C-1 of this appendix.
1.5.2 If both the inlet and outlet NOX continuous emission
monitoring systems are unavailable simultaneously, use the maximum
inlet NOX emission rate for the corresponding unit load recorded by
the NOX continuous emission monitoring system at the inlet during
the previous 2160 quality-assured monitor operating hours to
substitute for the inlet NOX emission rate in equation C-2 of this
appendix.
1.6 Application
Apply to the Administrator for approval and certification of the
parametric substitution procedure for filling in missing SO2
concentration or NOX emission rate data using the established
criteria and information identified above. DO not use this
procedure until approved by the Administrator.
2. Load-based Procedure for Missing Flow Rate, NOX Concentration,
and NOX Emission Rate Data 2.1 Applicability
This procedure is applicable for data from all affected units
for use in accordance with the provisions of this part to provide
substitute data for volumetric flow rate (scfh), NOX emission rate
(in lb/mmBtu) from NOX-diluent continuous emission monitoring
systems, and NOX concentration data (in ppm) from NOx concentration
monitoring systems used to determine NOX mass emissions.
2.2 Procedure
2.2.1 For a single unit, establish ten operating load ranges
defined in terms of percent of the maximum hourly average gross
load of the unit, in gross megawatts (MWge), as shown in Table C-1.
(Do not use integrated hourly gross load in MW-hr.) For units
sharing a common stack monitored with a single flow monitor, the
load ranges for flow (but not for NOX) may be broken down into 20
operating load ranges in increments of 5.0 percent of the combined
maximum hourly average gross load of all units utilizing the common
stack. If this option is selected, the twentieth (uppermost)
operating load range shall include all values greater than 95.0
percent of the maximum hourly average gross load. For a
cogenerating unit or other unit at which some portion of the heat
input is not used to produce electricity or for a unit for which
hourly average gross load in MWge is not recorded separately, use
the hourly gross steam load of the unit, in pounds of steam per
hour at the measured temperature (°F) and pressure (psia) instead
of MWge. Indicate a change in the number of load ranges or the
units of loads to be used in the precertification section of the
monitoring plan.
Table C-1 - Definition of Operating Load
Ranges for Load-based Substitution Data Procedures
Operating load range |
Percent of maximum hourly
gross load or maximum hourly gross steam load (percent) |
1 |
0-10 |
2 |
>10-20 |
3 |
>20-30 |
4 |
>30-40 |
5 |
>40-50 |
6 |
>50-60 |
7 |
>60-70 |
8 |
>70-80 |
9 |
>80-90 |
10 |
>90 |
2.2.2 Beginning with the first hour of unit operation after
installation and certification of the flow monitor or the
NOX-diluent continuous emission monitoring system (or a NOX
concentration monitoring system used to determine NOX mass
emissions, as defined in § 75.71(a)(2)), for each hour of unit
operation record a number, 1 through 10, (or 1 through 20 for flow
at common stacks) that identifies the operating load range
corresponding to the integrated hourly gross load of the unit(s)
recorded for each unit operating hour.
2.2.3 Beginning with the first hour of unit operation after
installation and certification of the flow monitor or the
NOX-diluent continuous emission monitoring system (or a NOX
concentration monitoring system used to determine NOX mass
emissions, as defined in § 75.71(a)(2)) and continuing thereafter,
the data acquisition and handling system must be capable of
calculating and recording the following information for each unit
operating hour of missing flow or NOX data within each identified
load range during the shorter of: (a) the previous 2,160
quality-assured monitor operating hours (on a rolling basis), or
(b) all previous quality-assured monitor operating hours.
2.2.3.1 Average of the hourly flow rates reported by a flow
monitor, in scfh.
2.2.3.2 The 90th percentile value of hourly flow rates, in
scfh.
2.2.3.3 The 95th percentile value of hourly flow rates, in
scfh.
2.2.3.4 The maximum value of hourly flow rates, in scfh.
2.2.3.5 Average of the hourly NOX emission rate, in lb/mmBtu,
reported by a NOX continuous emission monitoring system.
2.2.3.6 The 90th percentile value of hourly NOX emission rates,
in lb/mmBtu.
2.2.3.7 The 95th percentile value of hourly NOX emission rates,
in lb/mmBtu.
2.2.3.8 The maximum value of hourly NOX emission rates, in
lb/mmBtu.
2.2.3.9 Average of the hourly NOX pollutant concentrations, in
ppm, reported by a NOX concentration monitoring system used to
determine NOX mass emissions, as defined in § 75.71(a)(2).
2.2.3.10 The 90th percentile value of hourly NOX pollutant
concentration, in ppm.
2.2.3.11 The 95th percentile value of hourly NOX pollutant
concentration, in ppm.
2.2.3.12 The maximum value of hourly NOX pollutant
concentration, in ppm.
2.2.4 Calculate all monitor or continuous emission monitoring
system data averages, maximum values, and percentile values
determined by this procedure using bias adjusted values in the load
ranges.
2.2.5 When a bias adjustment is necessary for the flow monitor
and/or the NOX-diluent continuous emission monitoring system
(and/or the NOX concentration monitoring system used to determine
NOX mass emissions, as defined in § 75.71(a)(2)), apply the
adjustment factor to all monitor or continuous emission monitoring
system data values placed in the load ranges.
2.2.6 Use the calculated monitor or monitoring system data
averages, maximum values, and percentile values to substitute for
missing flow rate and NOX emission rate data (and where applicable,
NOX concentration data) according to the procedures in subpart D of
this part.
3. Non-load-based Procedure for Missing Flow Rate, NOX
Concentration, and NOX Emission Rate Data (Optional) 3.1
Applicability
For affected units that do not produce electrical output in
megawatts or thermal output in klb/hr of steam, this procedure may
be used in accordance with the provisions of this part to provide
substitute data for volumetric flow rate (scfh), NOX emission rate
(in lb/mmBtu) from NOX-diluent continuous emission monitoring
systems, and NOX concentration data (in ppm) from NOX concentration
monitoring systems used to determine NOX mass emissions.
3.2 Procedure
3.2.1 For each monitored parameter (flow rate, NOX emission
rate, or NOX concentration), establish at least two, but no more
than ten operational bins, corresponding to various operating
conditions and parameters (or combinations of these) that affect
volumetric flow rate or NOX emissions. Include a complete
description of each operational bin in the hardcopy portion of the
monitoring plan required under § 75.53(e)(2), identifying the
unique combination of parameters and operating conditions
associated with the bin and explaining the relationship between
these parameters and conditions and the magnitude of the stack gas
flow rate or NOX emissions. Assign a unique number, 1 through 10,
to each operational bin. Examples of conditions and parameters that
may be used to define operational bins include unit heat input,
type of fuel combusted, specific stages of an industrial process,
or (for common stacks), the particular combination of units that
are in operation.
3.2.2 In the electronic quarterly report required under § 75.64,
indicate for each hour of unit operation the operational bin
associated with the NOX or flow rate data, by recording the number
assigned to the bin under section 3.2.1 of this appendix.
3.2.3 The data acquisition and handling system must be capable
of properly identifying and recording the operational bin number
for each unit operating hour. The DAHS must also be capable of
calculating and recording the following information (as applicable)
for each unit operating hour of missing flow or NOX data within
each identified operational bin during the shorter of:
(a) The previous 2,160 quality-assured monitor operating hours
(on a rolling basis), or
(b) All previous quality-assured monitor operating hours in the
previous 3 years:
3.2.3.1 Average of the hourly flow rates reported by a flow
monitor (scfh).
3.2.3.2 The 90th percentile value of hourly flow rates
(scfh).
3.2.3.3 The 95th percentile value of hourly flow rates
(scfh).
3.2.3.4 The maximum value of hourly flow rates (scfh).
3.2.3.5 Average of the hourly NOX emission rates, in lb/mmBtu,
reported by a NOX-diluent continuous emission monitoring
system.
3.2.3.6 The 90th percentile value of hourly NOX emission rates
(lb/mmBtu).
3.2.3.7 The 95th percentile value of hourly NOX emission rates
(lb/mmBtu).
3.2.3.8 The maximum value of hourly NOX emission rates, in
(lb/mmBtu).
3.2.3.9 Average of the hourly NOX pollutant concentrations
(ppm), reported by a NOX concentration monitoring system used to
determine NOX mass emissions, as defined in § 75.71(a)(2).
3.2.3.10 The 90th percentile value of hourly NOX pollutant
concentration (ppm).
3.2.3.11 The 95th percentile value of hourly NOX pollutant
concentration (ppm).
3.2.3.12 The maximum value of hourly NOX pollutant concentration
(ppm).
3.2.4 When a bias adjustment is necessary for the flow monitor
and/or the NOX-diluent continuous emission monitoring system
(and/or the NOX concentration monitoring system), apply the bias
adjustment factor to all data values placed in the operational
bins.
3.2.5 Calculate all CEMS data averages, maximum values, and
percentile values determined by this procedure using bias-adjusted
values.
3.2.6 Use the calculated monitor or monitoring system data
averages, maximum values, and percentile values to substitute for
missing flow rate and NOX emission rate data (and where applicable,
NOX concentration data) according to the procedures in subpart D of
this part.
[58 FR 3701, Jan. 11, 1993, as amended at 60 FR 26547, 26548, May
17, 1995; 63 FR 57313, Oct. 27, 1998; 64 FR 28652, May 26, 1999; 67
FR 40459, June 12, 2002]