Appendix B to Part 247 - CE Publications
32:2.1.1.1.44.0.1.8.22 : Appendix B
Appendix B to Part 247 - CE Publications
A. Purpose. CE publications consist of DoD newspapers,
magazines, guides, and installation maps. They support command
internal communications. The commander or public affairs office
provides oversight and final approval authority for the news and
editorial content of the publication. CE publishers sell
advertising to cover costs and secure earnings, print the
publications, and may make all or part of the distribution.
Periodically, CE publishers compete for contracts to publish these
publications. Neither appropriated nor nonappropriated funds shall
be used to pay for any part of a CE publisher's costs incurred in
publishing a CE publication.
B. Name. The name of the publication may include the name
of the command or installation, or the name of the command or
installation may appear separately in the nameplate (flag). The
emblem of the command or installation may also be included in the
nameplate. When possible, the DoD Components and their subordinates
shall trademark the names of their publications, as stated in §
247.6(d).
C. Masthead. The masthead shall include the following in
addition to that required in § 247.4 (i) and (j). “The editorial
content of this publication is the responsibility of the (name of
command or installation) Public Affairs Office.” The names of the
commanding officer and PAO, the names and editorial titles of the
staff assigned the duty of preparing the editorial content, and the
office address and telephone number of the editorial staff shall be
listed in the masthead of DoD newspapers, but is not required in CE
guides and installation maps. The names of the publisher and
employees of the publisher may be listed separately.
D. News and editorial materials. The commander or the
public affairs office shall provide oversight and final approval
authority for news, information, photographs, editorial, and other
materials to be used in a CE publication in the space allotted for
that purpose by written contract with the commercial publisher.
Authorized news and information sources include the OASD(PA), AFIS,
the Military Departments and their subordinate levels of command,
and other Government Agencies. CE contractor personnel may provide
material for use in the publication if approved by the commander or
PAO, as the commander's representative. Commercial news and opinion
sources, such as AP, UPI, New York Times, etc., are not normally
authorized for use in DoD publications except as stated in §
247.4(q). Newspapers may publish community service news and
announcements of the civilian community for the benefit of command
or installation personnel and their families. Imagery used will be
in compliance with § 247.4(r).
E. Assignment of personnel. Neither military nor DoD
civilian personnel shall be assigned to duty at the premises of the
CE publisher. Neither military nor DoD civilian personnel shall
perform any job functions that are part of the business activities
or contractual responsibilities of the CE publisher either at the
contractor's facility or the Government facility. The PAO and staff
who produce the non-advertising content of the CE publication may
perform certain installation liaison functions on publisher
premises including monitoring and coordinating layout and design
and other publishing details set forth in the contract to ensure
the effective presentation of information. One or more members of
the public affairs staff shall review proof copy to prevent
mistakes. Newspaper text-editing-system pagination and copy
terminals owned by the CE publisher may be placed in the command or
installation public affairs office under contractual agreement for
use by the public affairs staff to coordinate layout and ensure
that the preparation of editorial material is performed in such a
way as to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of the printing
and publication functions performed by the CE publisher. All costs
of these terminals shall be borne by the CE newspaper publishers
who shall retain title to the equipment and full responsibility for
any damage to or loss of such equipment. The relationship between
the public affairs staff and employees of the CE contractor is that
of Government employees working with employees of a private
contractor. Supervision of CE employees; that is, the
responsibility to rate performance, set rate of pay, grant vacation
time, exercise discipline, assign day-to-day administrative tasks,
etc., remains with the CE publisher. Any modification of the
contract must be made by the responsible contracting officer.
Public affairs staff members must be aware that employees of the
contractor are not employees of the government and should be
treated accordingly.
F. Distribution of CE publications.
1. A funded newspaper shall not be distributed as an insert to a
CE newspaper, unless provided for in the CE contract, nor shall a
CE newspaper be distributed as an insert to a funded newspaper.
2. Supplements, clearly labeled as such, and advertising
inserts, may be inserted into and distributed with a CE
newspaper.
3. The commercial publisher of a CE publication shall make as
much of the distribution to the intended readership as possible. CE
publications may be distributed through official channels.
4. Except as authorized by the next higher headquarters for
special situations or occasions (such as an installation open
house), CE publications shall not be distributed outside the
intended DoD audience and retirees, which includes family members.
Electronic publication on the internet/world wide web is not
considered distribution outside the intended DoD audience. The CE
publisher may provide complete copies of each specific issue of a
CE publication to an advertiser whose advertisement is carried
therein.
5. The CE publisher of a CE newspaper will provide the
appropriate number of news racks determined by the installation
commander for publication distribution.
CE publishers are responsible for maintenance of these
racks.
6. CE guides, magazines, and installation maps may be delivered
in bulk quantities to the appropriate installation offices to
distribute these publications through official channels as
necessary.
G. Responsibilities regarding advertising.
1. Only the CE publisher shall use the space agreed upon for
advertising. While the editorial content of the publication is
completely controlled by the installation, the advertising section,
including its content, is the responsibility of the CE publisher.
The public affairs staff, however, retains the responsibility to
review advertisements before they are printed.
2. Any decision by a CE publisher to accept or reject an
advertisement is final. The PAO may discuss with a publisher their
decision not to run an advertisement, but cannot substitute his
judgment for that of the publisher.
3. Before each issue of a CE publication is printed, the public
affairs staff shall review advertisements to identify any that are
contrary to law or to DoD or Military Service regulations,
including this part, or that may pose a danger or detriment to DoD
personnel or their family members, or that interfere with the
command or installation missions. It is in the command's best
interest to carefully apply DoD and Service regulations and request
exclusion of only those advertisements that are clearly in
violation of this part. If any such advertisements are identified,
the public affairs office shall obtain a legal coordination of the
proposed exclusion. After coordination, the public affairs office
shall request, in writing if necessary, that the commercial
publisher delete any such advertisements. If the publisher prints
the issue containing the objectionable advertisement(s), the
commander may prohibit distribution in accordance with DoD
Directive 1325.6. 1
1 Copies may be obtained, at cost, from the National Technical
Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA
22161.
4. DoD Directive 1325.6 gives the commander authority to
prohibit distribution on the installation of a CE publication
containing advertising he or she determines likely to promote a
situation leading to potential riots or other disturbances, or when
the circulation of such advertising may present a danger to
loyalty, discipline, or morale of personnel. Each commander shall
determine whether particular advertisements to be placed by the
publisher in a CE publication serving the command or installation
may interfere with successful mission performance. Some
considerations in this decision are the local situation, the
content of the proposed advertisement, and the past performance of
the advertiser. Prior to making a determination to prohibit
distribution of a CE publication, the commander shall obtain a
legal coordination.
5. CE publications may carry paid and nonpaid advertising of the
products and services of nonappropriated fund activities and
commissaries, if allowed by DoD and Military Service regulations.
(See DoD Instruction 1015.2 2 )
2 See footnote 1 to section G.3. of this appendix.
6. The Military Departments will coordinate a standard set or
ratios of advertising-to-editorial copy for multiples of pages for
run of the publication advertising in CE publications that will be
included in all DoD Component regulations supplementing this part.
The recommended annual average is a ratio of 60/40. Inserts and
advertising supplements will not count in the total ad-to-copy
ratio; However, the commander may prohibit the distribution of
supplemental advertising deemed excessive.
7. Bingo games and lotteries conducted by a commercial
organization whose primary business is conducting lotteries may not
be advertised in CE publications. Non-lottery activities (such as
dining at a restaurant or attending a musical performance) of a
commercial organization whose primary business is conducting
lotteries may be advertised in CE publications. Exceptions are
allowed for authorized State lotteries, lotteries conducted by a
not-for-profit organization or a governmental organization, or
conducted as a promotional activity by a commercial organization
and clearly occasional and ancillary to the primary business of
that organization. An exception also pertains to any gaming
conducted by an Indian tribe under 25 U.S.C. 2720. See section D.
of appendix C to this part.
H. CE guides and maps.
1. The name of the publication may include the name and emblem
of the command or installation.
2. At the discretion of the commander, an installation telephone
directory may be included as a section of a CE guide. The telephone
section shall be part of the guide contract specifications.
Separate contracts for CE telephone directories are not authorized.
Over-run printing of the telephone directory/yellow pages section
of the installation guide is authorized. The number of guides with
integral telephone directories and the number of over-run copies of
the telephone directory/yellow pages will be clearly specified in
the single guide contract. Required communication security
information shall be printed on the first page of the telephone
section and not on the cover of the guide. The cover of the guide
may notify users that the publication contains the telephone
directory.
3. CE contracts for guides and maps shall establish firm
delivery dates and shall contain provisions to ensure distribution
is controlled by the command. Delivery dates may vary for guides
and maps to make them more attractive to advertisers. The contract
provisions shall specify delivery dates.
I. Employment and gratuities. DoDpersonnel shall not
accept any gratuities from or employment with any CE publisher in
violation of DoD Directive 5500.7-R. 3 In addition, DoD personnel
whose spouse or children (or other relations as described in DoD
Directive 5500.7-R) are offered employment by, or work for, a CE
publisher, must take appropriate action to avoid conflicts of
interest.
3 See footnote 1 to section G.3. of this appendix.
J. Contracting for a CE publication.
1. General. The DoD Components and their subordinate
commands are authorized to contract in writing for CE publications.
The underlying premise of the CE concept is that the DoD Components
and their subordinate commands will save money by transferring
certain publishing and distribution functions to a commercial
publisher selected through a competitive process. The CE
publication is printed and delivered to the command, installation,
or its readership in accordance with the terms of a written
contract. Oral contracts are not acceptable. The right to sell and
circulate advertising to the complete readership in the CE
publication provides the publisher revenue to cover costs and
secure earnings. The command or installation guarantees first
publication and distribution of locally-produced editorial content
in the publication. The publication becomes the property of the
command, installation, or intended reader upon delivery in
accordance with terms of the contract.
2. Contracting process. Whether a first time initiative
to establish a CE publication or a recompetition of an existing CE
contract, the process must start with advance planning as to the
nature of the command's requirements, the contracting strategy, and
the market of potential advertisers and competitors for the job.
The CE contract solicitation and the contract itself must contain a
statement of work that describes in legally sufficient detail the
Government's requirements and the conditions and restrictions under
which the contractor will perform. The cognizant contracting office
for the CE contracting action shall be the contracting office which
normally provides contracting support to the command for service
contracts and other procurements of a general nature which are
above the simplified small purchase threshold. The contracting
officer shall combine the statement of work with appropriate
contractual terms and conditions, using 48 CFR chapter I and II as
guides, although CE contracts are not subject to the FAR or DFARS,
because they do not involve the expenditure of appropriated funds.
The resulting solicitation and contract shall completely identify
the rights and obligations of both parties. Proposals shall be
solicited from all known commercial publishers who could
potentially become the CE contractor. Upon evaluation of the
competing proposals by the Source Selection Advisory Committee
(SSAC) and selection of a winner by the selecting official, the CE
contract shall be awarded by the contracting officer. The CE
contract shall not require the contractor to pay money to the
command or to provide goods, services, or other consideration not
directly related to the CE publication. In the event that only one
offer is received, the SSAC may recommend to the selecting official
that no award be made or that the contracting officer enter into
negotiations with the sole offeror to obtain the best possible
service and product for the Government.
3. Statement of Work (SOW). The SOW should be written to
have the CE contractor perform as many of the publishing and
distribution functions as practical to generate maximum savings to
the Department of Defense. In so doing, care must be taken to
balance Government requirements with a realistic view of the
advertising revenue potential so as to achieve a contract that is
commercially viable. The command's internal information needs shall
be paramount. Some of the key issues that shall be addressed in the
SOW follow:
a. A general description of the scope of the proposed contract
including the name and nature of the publication involved; for
example, weekly newspaper, monthly magazine, annual guide and
installation map. Normally, guides and installation maps are
included in the same contract.
b. A description of editorial content to be carried; e.g., news,
features, supplements, and factual information, along with
provisions addressing the possible inclusion of
contractor-furnished advertising supplements for newspapers,
provided any such supplement shall have the prior approval of the
commander.
c. A description of the rules for the inclusion of advertising
in the publication, substantially as follows: “The contractor
agrees not to include in the publication any advertising of the
following types: (1) paid political advertisements for a candidate,
party, or which advocate a particular position on a political
issue, including advertisements advocating a position on any
proposed DoD policy or policy under review, or which advocate
lobbying elected officials on a specific issue; (2) advertisements
for any establishment declared “off limits” by the command; (3)
advertisements that are contrary to law or to DoD or Military
Service regulations or that in the government's opinion pose a
danger or detriment to DoD personnel or their family members, or
that interfere with the command or installation missions; (4)
advertisements for bingo games or lotteries conducted by a
commercial organization whose primary business is conducting
lotteries; (5) (other restrictions deemed appropriate by the
Service/command, if any.)” Additionally, the contract will contain
provisions which: (1) specify the annual average
advertising-to-editorial ratio for newspapers and magazines; (2)
state that the commander's representative shall have the authority
to specify newspaper advertising layout when required to enhance
communication's effectiveness of the publication; and (3) which
requires the contractor to notify advertisers of the requirements
in § 247.4(i) and § 247.4(j).
d. A provision substantially as follows: “The contractor agrees
not to enter into any exclusive advertising agreement with any
firm, broker, or individual for the purpose of selling advertising
associated with this contract.”
e. A description of the CE contractor's responsibilities for
distribution of the publication. This provision should address such
matters as contractor furnishing of news racks along with
contractor responsibility for maintenance of these racks.
f. A description of contractor-owned and/or contractor-furnished
equipment such as text editing, copy terminals, and modems
determined to be required to coordinate layout and ensure that the
preparation of editorial material is performed in such a way as to
enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of the publication
process.
g. A description of contractor-furnished editorial support
services determined to be required. Such description must be in
terms of the end product required; e.g., photography service and/or
writer/reporter services, and not as a requirement to make
available certain contractor personnel. In day-to-day performance
and administration of the CE contract, contractor personnel
performing such support services shall not be treated in any way as
though they are Government employees.
h. A provision that the use, where economically feasible, of
recycled paper for internal products will be a consideration for
awarding the contract, as stated in § 247.6 (e).
i. SOW's and RFP's for CE newspapers shall specify standard
newsprint, recyclable, subject to requirements of applicable laws
and regulations.
j. For CE magazines, a provision requiring the contractor to
provide a bulk number of copies of each printing to the Government
Printing Office (GPO) for distribution to Federal Depository
Libraries. The number of copies to be provided will be determined
on the number of libraries desiring to subscribe to the
publication. The number could be a maximum of 1,400, but has
historically averaged approximately 500 to 600 copies for military
magazines. The contractor would be required to contact GPO to
initiate this procedure at (202) 512-1071.
4. Contract provisions. The CE concept is based on an
exception to the Government Printing and Binding Regulations 4
published by the Congressional Joint Committee on Printing. While
CE contracts are not subject to the FAR (48 CFR chapter I) or the
DFARS (48 CFR chapter II), the FAR contains many clauses that are
useful in protecting the interests of the Government. The following
clauses may be helpful in obtaining the best possible CE
publication:
4 Copies may be obtained, at cost, from the Superintendent of
Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC
20402.
a. Status of FAR clause. To clarify the status of FAR
clauses appearing in CE contracts, the following clause shall be
included in all new CE contracts:
“The (name of DoD installation/unit/organization) is an element
of the United States Government. This agreement is a United States
Government contract authorized under the provisions of DoD
Instruction 5120.4 5 as an exception to the Government Printing and
Binding Regulations published by the Congressional Joint Committee
on Printing. Although this contract is not subject to the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) or the Defense FAR Supplement (DFARS),
FAR clauses useful in protecting the interests of the Government
and implementing those provisions required by law are included in
this contract.”
5 See footnote 1 to section G.3. of this appendix.
b. Option clause. Insert a clause substantially the same
as the following to extend the term of the CE publisher
contract:
(1) “The Government may extend the term of this contract by
written notice to the contractor within [insert in the clause the
period of time in which the contracting officer has to exercise the
option]; provided that the Government shall give the contractor a
preliminary written notice of its intent to exercise the option at
least 60 days before the contract expires. The preliminary notice
does not commit the government to exercise the option.” In the case
of base closure or realignment the publisher has the right to
request a renegotiation of the contract.
(2) “If the Government exercises this option, the extended
contract shall be considered to include this option provision.”
(3) “The total duration of this contract, including the exercise
of any options under this clause, shall not exceed 6 years.”
c. Default clause. Insert the following clause in
solicitations and contracts:
(1) “The Government may, by written notice of default to the
contractor, terminate this contract in whole or in part if the
contractor fails to:
(a) Deliver the CE publications in the quantities required or to
perform the services within the time specified in this contract or
any extension;
(b) Make progress, so as to endanger performance of this
contract;
(c) Perform any of the other provisions of this contract.”
(2) “If the Government terminates this contract in whole or in
part, it may acquire, under the terms and in the manner the
contracting officer considers appropriate, supplies or services
similar to those terminated. However, the contractor shall continue
the work not terminated.”
(3) “The rights and remedies of the Government in this clause
are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or
under this contract.”
d. Termination for convenience of the Government. Insert
the following clause in solicitations and contracts:
“The contracting officer, by written notice, may terminate this
contract, in whole or in part if the services contracted for are no
longer required by the Government, or when it is in the
Government's interest, such as with installation closures. Any such
termination shall be at no cost to the Government.” The Government
will use its best efforts to mitigate financial hardship on the
publisher.
5. Term of contract. CE contracts may be entered into for
an initial period of up to 2 years, and may contain options to
extend the contract for one or more additional periods of 1 or 2
years duration. The total period of the contract, including
options, shall not exceed 6 years, after which the contract must be
recompeted.
6. Exercise of options. Under normal circumstances, when
the contractor is performing satisfactorily, options for additional
periods of performance should be exercised. However, the exercise
of the option is the exclusive right of the Government.
7. Modification of the contract. Any changes to the SOW
or other terms and conditions of the contract shall be made by
written contract modification signed by both parties.
8. SSAC. The commander shall appoint an SSAC. The
committee shall participate in the development of the Source
Selection Plan (SSP) before the solicitation of proposals, evaluate
proposals, and recommend a source to the selecting official. Since
cost is not a factor in the evaluation, award will be based on
technical proposals, the offeror's experience and/or
qualifications, and past performance.
a. The SSAC shall consist of a minimum of five voting members: a
chairperson, who shall be a senior member of the command; senior
representatives from public affairs and printing; and a minimum of
two other functional specialists with skills relevant to the
selection process. Each SSAC shall have non-voting legal and
contracting advisors to assist in the selection process.
b. In arriving at its recommendations, the SSAC shall follow the
SSP and avail itself of all relevant information, including the
proposals submitted, independently derived data regarding offerors'
performance records, the results of on-site surveys of offerors'
facilities, where feasible, and in appropriate cases, personal
presentations by offerors.
c. The work of the SSAC must be coordinated with the contracting
officer to ensure that the process is objective and fair. All
communications between the offerors and the Government shall be
through the contracting officer. No member of the SSAC or the
selecting official shall communicate directly with any offeror
regarding the source selection.
d. In cases where a losing competitor requests a debriefing from
the contracting officer, members of the SSAC may be called upon to
participate so as to give the losing competitor the most thorough
explanation practical as to why its proposal was not successful. No
information regarding competitors' proposals shall be discussed
with the unsuccessful offerors during debriefings, discussions, or
negotiations.
9. SSP. A SSP (see sample SSP at attachment 1 to this
appendix) must be developed early in the planning process to serve
as a guide for the personnel involved and ensure a fair and
objective process and a successful outcome. The contracting officer
is primarily responsible for development of the SSP, in
coordination with the PAO and other members of the SSAC. Ideally,
the SSP should be completed and approved prior to issuance of the
solicitation; it must be completed and approved before the receipt
of proposals.
10. Evaluation criteria and proposal requirements. The
solicitation must specify, in relative order of importance, the
factors the Government will consider in selecting the most
advantageous proposal. In addition, the solicitation must specify
the types of information the proposal must contain to be properly
evaluated. These two aspects of the solicitation must closely
parallel one another. The contracting officer is primarily
responsible for development of these two solicitation provisions,
in coordination with the PAO, legal counsel, and members of the
SSAC.
a. Evaluation criteria for award. Drawing upon the SSP,
this feature of the solicitation must advise offerors what factors
the Government will consider in evaluating proposals and the
relative importance of each factor. The sample SSP (attachment 1 to
this appendix) provides an example of criteria that might be used.
Note that under the “Services and/or Items Offered” factor,
paragraph E.2.b. of attachment 1 to this appendix, it is necessary
to list and indicate the relative importance of services and/or
items above the minimum requirements of the SOW that the
command would consider desirable and that, if offered, will enhance
the offeror's evaluation standing. The offer of services and/or
items not listed in the evaluation criteria shall not be considered
in the evaluation of proposals, but may be accepted in the contract
award if deemed valuable to the Government, PROVIDED the service
and/or item involved is directly related to producing the
publication and not in violation of any other statute or
regulation. Examples of items that cannot be considered during the
evaluation process are; press kits, laminated maps, economic
development reports, or other separate publications not an integral
part of the CE publication.
b. Proposal requirements. This provision of the
solicitation must describe the specific and general types of
information necessary to be submitted as part of the proposal to be
evaluated. Offerors shall be notified that unnecessarily elaborate
proposals are not desired.
Attachment 1 to Appendix B to Part 247 - SSP A. Introduction
1. The objectives of this plan are:
a. To ensure an impartial, equitable, and thorough evaluation of
all offerors' proposals in accordance with the evaluation criteria
presented in the request for proposals (RFP).
b. To ensure that the contracting officer is provided technical
evaluation findings of the SSAC in such a manner that selection of
the offer most advantageous to the Government is ensured.
c. To document clearly and thoroughly all aspects of the
evaluation and decision process to provide effective debriefings to
unsuccessful offerors, to respond to legal challenges to the
selection, and to ensure adherence to evaluation criteria.
2. This plan will be used to select a CE contractor for
publication of the __________ newspaper (CE guide, magazine, or
installation map) and will:
a. Give each SSAC member a clear understanding of his or her
responsibilities as well as a complete overview of the evaluation
process.
b. Establish a well-balanced evaluation structure, equitable and
uniform scoring procedures, and a thorough and accurate appraisal
of all considerations pertinent to the negotiated contracting
process.
c. Provide the selecting official with meaningful findings that
are clearly presented and founded on the collective, independent
judgment of technical and managerial experts.
d. Ensure identification and selection of a contractor whose
final proposal offers optimum satisfaction of the Government's
technical and managerial requirements as expressed in the RFP.
e. Serve as part of the official record for the evaluation
process.
B. Organization and Staffing
1. The SSAC will consist of the Chairperson and a minimum of
four other voting committee members plus the non-voting advisors to
the SSAC.
2. The SSAC committee members are:
Name |
Position |
|
Chairperson |
|
Member |
|
Member |
|
Member |
|
Member |
|
Legal
Advisor 1 |
|
Contract
Advisor 1 |
C. Responsibilities
1. Selecting Official:
a. Approves the SSP.
b. Reviews the evaluation and findings of the SSAC.
c. Considers the SSAC's recommendation of award.
d. Selects the successful offeror.
2. Chairperson of the Source Selection Advisory Committee
(C/SSAC):
a. Reviews the SSP.
b. Approves membership of the SSAC.
c. Analyzes the evaluation and findings of the SSAC and applies
weights to the evaluation results.
d. Approves the SSAC report for submission to the selecting
official.
3. Contracting Officer:
a. Is responsible for the proper and efficient conduct of the
entire source selection process encompassing solicitation,
evaluation, selection, and contract award.
b. Provides SSAC and the selecting official with guidance and
instructions to conduct the evaluation and selection process.
c. Receives proposals submitted and makes them available to the
SSAC, taking necessary precautions to ensure against premature or
unauthorized disclosure of source selection information.
4. SSAC members shall:
a. Familiarize themselves with the RFP and SSP.
b. Provide a fair and impartial review and evaluation of each
proposal against the solicitation requirements and evaluation
criteria.
c. Provide written documentation substantiating their
evaluations to include strengths, weaknesses, and any deficiencies
of each proposal.
5. Legal advisor:
a. Reviews RFP and SSP for form and legality.
b. Advises the SSAC members of their duties and
responsibilities, regarding procurement integrity issues and
confidentiality requirements.
c. Participate in SSAC meetings and provide legal advice as
required.
d. Provides legal review of all documents supporting the
selection decision to ensure legal sufficiency and consistency with
the evaluation criteria in the RFP and SSP.
e. Advises the selecting official on the legality of the
selection decision.
D. Administrative Instructions
1. Evaluation overview. The advisory committee will
operate with maximum flexibility. Collective discussion by
evaluators at committee meetings of their evaluation findings is
permitted in the interchange of viewpoints regarding strengths,
weaknesses, and deficiencies noted in the proposals relating to
evaluation items. Evaluators will not suggest or disclose numerical
scores or other information regarding the relative standing of
offerors outside of committee meetings.
2. Evaluation procedure. The evaluation of offers is
based on good judgment and a thorough knowledge of the guidelines
and criteria applicable to each evaluation factor.
a. Numerical scoring is merely reflective of the composite
findings of the SSAC. The evaluation scoring system is used as a
tool to assist the Chairperson of the SSAC in determining the
proposal most advantageous to the Government.
b. The most important documents supporting the contract award
will be the findings, conclusions, and reports of the SSAC.
3. Safeguarding data. The sensitivity of the proceedings
and documentation require stringent and special safeguards
throughout the evaluation process:
a. Inadvertent release of information could be a source of
considerable misunderstanding and embarrassment to the Government.
It is imperative, therefore, for all members of the SSAC to avoid
any unauthorized disclosures of information pertaining to this
evaluation. Evaluation participants will observe the following
rules:
(1) All offeror and evaluation materials will be secured when
not in use (i.e., during breaks, lunch, and at the end of the
day).
(2) All attempted communications by offeror's representatives
shall be directed to the contracting officer. No communications
between members of the SSAC or the selecting official and offerors
regarding the contract award or evaluation is permitted except when
called upon under the provisions of paragraph J.8.d, of appendix B
to this part.
(3) Neither SSAC members or the selecting official shall
disclose anything pertaining to the source selection process to any
offeror except as authorized by the contracting officer.
(4) Neither SSAC members or the selecting official shall discuss
the substantive issues of the evaluation with any unauthorized
individual, even after award of the contract.
E. Technical Evaluation Procedures
1. Evaluation process. Proposals will be evaluated based
on the following criteria as indicated in Section M of the
solicitation: The evaluation worksheet (attachment 2 to this
appendix) shall be used to score the technical factors. Using the
technical evaluation worksheet, each member of the SSAC will
independently review each proposal and assign an appropriate number
of points to each factor being considered. Point scores for each
factor will range from “0” to “5” based on the committee member's
evaluation of the proposal. Upon completion of individual
evaluations, the group will meet in committee with the Chairperson
and arrive at a single numeric score for each factor in the
proposal.
2. Criteria. An example of applicable evaluation criteria
and their relative order of importance are listed below in
paragraphs E.2. a. through d. of this appendix. Criteria and
weights are provided as an example only. The SSAC must determine
its own weighting factors tailored to meet the needs of the
particular CE publication and describe the relative weights
assigned in the RFP; e.g., “Evaluation factors are listed in
descending order of importance; criteria #1 is twice as important
as criteria #2,” etc.
a. Technical and production capability. Scores will range
from “0” (unacceptable), to “5” (exhibits state-of-the-art, award
winning, or clearly superior technical ability to produce the
required newspaper, magazine, guide, or installation map). Factors
to be considered for newspaper contracts include: level of
automation; compatibility of automation with existing PAO
automation (unless other automation is provided); printing
capability; production equipment; physical plant (capabilities);
and driving distance to the plant. Similar factors may be
considered for magazines, guides and installation maps.
b. Services and/or items offered. Scores will range from
“0” (unacceptable), to “5” (the offer of equipment, such as
automation equipment; or services, such as editorial or
photographic services as set forth in the contract solicitation
that will greatly enhance the newspaper and/or its production).
Factors to be considered for newspapers include: offer of
automation equipment and the quality and amount of equipment
offered; the quality and amount of services offered; the usefulness
of the services and/or items to the public affairs office in
enhancing the newspaper; the impact of the services and/or items on
other parts of the contract. Similar factors may be considered for
magazines, guides and installation maps. The offer of equipment or
services not specifically related to producing the publication will
not result in the assignment of a higher score.
c. Past performance record. Scores will range from “0”
(no experience in newspaper, magazine, guide, or installation map
publishing and/or unsatisfactory, previous performance), to “5”
(long-term, highly successful experience publishing similar
newspapers, magazines, guides, or installation maps). Factors to be
considered include: demonstrated ability to successfully produce a
CE or similar publication; demonstrated printing ability (types of
printing, history of newspaper, magazine, guide, or installation
map printing); demonstrated success in contract performance in a
timely and responsive manner; demonstrated capability to sell
advertising and successfully recoup publication costs.
d. Management approach. Scores will range from “0”
(approach unacceptable), to “5” (proposal demonstrates a sound and
innovative approach to interfacing with the PAO and managing the CE
publication operation). Factors to be considered include: The
offeror's proposed approach to:
(1) Interfacing with the PAO staff.
(2) Controlling the quality and timeliness of the finished
product.
(3) Sale of ads of the type that enhance the publication's image
in the community and with the readership at large.
(4) Ensuring that contractor's personnel are properly supervised
and managed.
3. Weighting factors. Points will be assigned to the
final score of each factor in a proposal as determined by
multiplying the score assigned (e.g., “0,” “1,” “2,” “3,” “4,” or
“5”) by the relative weight of the individual criterion as
indicated:
Factor |
Relative weight
(percent) |
Maximum points |
CRITERION 1 |
40 |
200 |
CRITERION 2 |
30 |
150 |
CRITERION 3 |
20 |
100 |
CRITERION 4 |
10 |
50 |
|
|
500 |
(EXAMPLE
ONLY): |
|
CRITERION 1:
Score 5 (5 × 40), Total Points |
200 |
CRITERION 1:
Score 4 (4 × 30), Total Points |
120 |
CRITERION 1:
Score 3 (3 × 20), Total Points |
60 |
CRITERION 1:
Score 2 (2 × 10), Total Points |
20 |
|
400 |
4. Report of findings and recommendations. After the SSAC
has completed final evaluation of proposals and all weighting has
been completed, the committee will prepare a written report of its
findings and recommendations, setting forth the consensus of the
committee and its composite scores (Sample at attachment 3 to this
appendix). The Chairperson will sign the report to confirm its
accuracy and his agreement with the recommendation. All copies of
proposals and evaluation worksheets will be returned to the
contracting officer.
Attachment 2 to Appendix B to Part 247 - Sample Evaluation
Worksheet CONTRACTOR EVALUATOR DATE EVALUATION CRITERIA AND SCORES
(RANGE 0-5 POINTS FOR EACH) 1. Technical and production capability:
2. Services and items offered: 3. Past performance record: 4.
Management approach: NARRATIVE DISCUSSION: 1
( 1 Discussions of strengths, weaknesses, and deficiencies
should reference the specific evaluation factor involved to ensure
that proposals are evaluated only against the criterion set forth
in the RFP, to facilitate debriefings, and to provide an effective
defense to any challenges regarding the legality of the selection
process.)
Strengths Weaknesses Deficiencies Attachment 3 to Appendix B to
Part 247 - Sample Memorandum for Selecting Official SUBJECT:
Evaluation of Proposals RFP No.
1. All proposals received in response to subject RFP have been
evaluated by the Source Selection Advisory Committee (SSAC). The
results and comments are listed below.
a. Offeror's proposals were rated as follows:
Offeror Name Numerical Score
b. Summary Narrative Comments.
(This section of the report shall be a summary of the individual
strengths and weaknesses in each proposal, along with any
deficiencies that are susceptible to being cured through written or
oral discussions with the offeror, as noted by the SSC evaluators.
This summary should be supported by detailed narratives contained
on the individual evaluator's worksheets.)
2. Recommendation.
Chairperson, SSAC