Appendix A to Part 851 - Worker Safety and Health Functional Areas
10:4.0.2.5.31.5.74.7.27 : Appendix A
Appendix A to Part 851 - Worker Safety and Health Functional Areas
This appendix establishes the mandatory requirements for
implementing the applicable functional areas required by §
851.24.
1. Construction Safety
(a) For each separately definable construction activity (e.g.,
excavations, foundations, structural steel, roofing) the
construction contractor must:
(1) Prepare and have approved by the construction manager an
activity hazard analysis prior to commencement of affected work.
Such analyses must:
(i) Identify foreseeable hazards and planned protective
measures;
(ii) Address further hazards revealed by supplemental site
information (e.g., site characterization data, as-built drawings)
provided by the construction manager;
(iii) Provide drawings and/or other documentation of protective
measures for which applicable Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA) standards require preparation by a
Professional Engineer or other qualified professional, and
(iv) Identify competent persons required for workplace
inspections of the construction activity, where required by OSHA
standards.
(2) Ensure workers are aware of foreseeable hazards and the
protective measures described within the activity analysis prior to
beginning work on the affected activity.
(3) Require that workers acknowledge being informed of the
hazards and protective measures associated with assigned work
activities. Those workers failing to utilize appropriate protective
measures must be subject to the construction contractor's
disciplinary process.
(b) During periods of active construction (i.e.,
excluding weekends, weather delays, or other periods of work
inactivity), the construction contractor must have a designated
representative on the construction worksite who is knowledgeable of
the project's hazards and has full authority to act on behalf of
the construction contractor. The contractor's designated
representative must make frequent and regular inspections of the
construction worksite to identify and correct any instances of
noncompliance with project safety and health requirements.
(c) Workers must be instructed to report to the construction
contractor's designated representative, hazards not previously
identified or evaluated. If immediate corrective action is not
possible or the hazard falls outside of project scope, the
construction contractor must immediately notify affected workers,
post appropriate warning signs, implement needed interim control
measures, and notify the construction manager of the action taken.
The contractor or the designated representative must stop work in
the affected area until appropriate protective measures are
established.
(d) The construction contractor must prepare a written
construction project safety and health plan to implement the
requirements of this section and obtain approval of the plan by the
construction manager prior to commencement of any work covered by
the plan. In the plan, the contractor must designate the
individual(s) responsible for on-site implementation of the plan,
specify qualifications for those individuals, and provide a list of
those project activities for which subsequent hazard analyses are
to be performed. The level of detail within the construction
project safety and health plan should be commensurate with the
size, complexity and risk level of the construction project. The
content of this plan need not duplicate those provisions that were
previously submitted and approved as required by § 851.11.
2. Fire Protection
(a) Contractors must implement a comprehensive fire safety and
emergency response program to protect workers commensurate with the
nature of the work that is performed. This includes appropriate
facility and site-wide fire protection, fire alarm notification and
egress features, and access to a fully staffed, trained, and
equipped emergency response organization that is capable of
responding in a timely and effective manner to site
emergencies.
(b) An acceptable fire protection program must include those
fire protection criteria and procedures, analyses, hardware and
systems, apparatus and equipment, and personnel that would
comprehensively ensure that the objective in paragraph 2(a) of this
section is met. This includes meeting applicable building codes and
National Fire Protection Association codes and standards.
3. Explosives Safety
(a) Contractors responsible for the use of explosive materials
must establish and implement a comprehensive explosives safety
program.
(b) Contractors must comply with the policy and requirements
specified in the appropriate explosives safety technical
standard.
(c) Contractors must determine the applicability of the
explosives safety directive requirements to research and
development laboratory type operations consistent with the DOE
level of protection criteria described in the explosives safety
directive.
4. Pressure Safety
(a) Contractors must establish safety policies and procedures to
ensure that pressure systems are designed, fabricated, tested,
inspected, maintained, repaired, and operated by trained and
qualified personnel in accordance with applicable and sound
engineering principles.
(b) Contractors must ensure that all pressure vessels, boilers,
air receivers, and supporting piping systems conform to:
(1) The applicable American Society of Mechanical Engineers
(ASME) boilers and pressure vessel codes (BPVC), including
applicable code cases as indicated in paragraphs (b)(1)(i) through
(xxxii) of this section:
(i) BPVC.I-2015, Section I - Rules for Construction of Power
Boilers (incorporated by reference, see § 851.27);
(ii) BPVC.II.A-2015, Section II-Materials, Part A - Ferrous
Material Specifications (Beginning to SA-450) (incorporated by
reference, see § 851.27);
(iii) BPVC.II.A-2015, Section II - Materials, Part A -
Ferrous Material Specifications (SA-451 to End) (incorporated
by reference, see § 851.27);
(iv) BPVC.II.B-2015, Section II - Materials, Part B -
Nonferrous Material Specifications (incorporated by reference,
see § 851.27);
(v) BPVC.II.C-2015, Section II - Materials, Part
C-Specification for Welding Rods; Electrodes, and Filler Metals
(incorporated by reference, see § 851.27);
(vi) BPVC.II.D.C-2015, Section II - Materials, Part D -
Properties (Customary) (incorporated by reference, see §
851.27);
(vii) BPVC.II.D.M-2015, Section II - Materials, Part D -
Properties (Metric) (incorporated by reference, see §
851.27);
(viii) BPVC.III.A-2015, Section III - Rules for Construction
of Nuclear Facility Components, Appendices (incorporated by
reference, see § 851.27);
(ix) BPVC.III.1.NB-2015, Section III - Rules for Construction
of Nuclear Facility Components, Division I - Subsection NB, Class 1
Components (incorporated by reference, see § 851.27);
(x) BPVC.III.1.NC-2015, Section III - Rules for Construction
of Nuclear Facility Components, Division I - Subsection NC, Class 2
Components (incorporated by reference, see § 851.27);
(xi) BPVC.III.1.ND-2015, Section III - Rules for Construction
of Nuclear Facility Components, Division I - Subsection ND, Class 3
Components (incorporated by reference, see § 851.27);
(xii) BPVC.III.1.NE-2015, Section III - Rules for
Construction of Nuclear Facility Components, Division I -
Subsection NE, Class MC Components (incorporated by reference,
see § 851.27);
(xiii) BPVC.III.1.NF-2015, Section III - Rules for
Construction of Nuclear Facility Components, Division I -
Subsection NF, Supports (incorporated by reference, see §
851.27);
(xiv) BPVC.III.1.NG-2015, Section III - Rules for
Construction of Nuclear Facility Components, Division I -
Subsection NG, Core Support Structures (incorporated by
reference, see § 851.27);
(xv) BPVC.III.1.NH-2015, Section III - Rules for Construction
of Nuclear Facility Components, Division I - Subsection NH, Class 1
Components in Elevated Temperature Service (incorporated by
reference, see § 851.27);
(xvi) BPVC.III.NCA-2015, Section III - Rules for Construction
of Nuclear Facility; Components, Subsection NCA, General
Requirements for Division 1 and Division 2 (incorporated by
reference, see § 851.27);
(xvii) BPVC.III.2-2015, Section III - Rules for Construction
of Nuclear Facility Components, Division 2, Code for Concrete
Containments (incorporated by reference, see § 851.27);
(xviii) BPVC.III.3-2015, Section III - Rules for Construction
of Nuclear Facility Components, Division 3, Containment for
Transportation and Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High Level
Radioactive Material and Waste (incorporated by reference, see
§ 851.27);
(xix) BPVC.III.5-2015, Section III - Rules for Construction
of Nuclear Facility Components, Division 5, High Temperature
Reactors (incorporated by reference, see § 851.27);
(xx) BPVC.IV-2015, Section IV, Rules for Construction of
Heating Boilers (incorporated by reference, see § 851.27);
(xxi) BPVC.V-2015, Section V, Nondestructive Examination
(incorporated by reference, see § 851.27);
(xxii) BPVC.VI-2015, Section VI, Recommended Rules for the
Care and Operation of Heating Boilers (incorporated by
reference, see § 851.27);
(xxiii) BPVC.VII-2015, Section VII, Recommended Guidelines
for the Care of Power Boilers (incorporated by reference, see §
851.27);
(xxiv) BPVC.VIII.1-2015, Section VIII - Rules for
Construction of Pressure Vessels, Division 1 (incorporated by
reference, see § 851.27);
(xxv) BPVC.VIII.2-2015, Section VIII - Rules for Construction
of Pressure Vessels, Division 2, Alternative Rules
(incorporated by reference, see § 851.27);
(xxvi) BPVC.VIII.3-2015, Section VIII - Rules for
Construction of Pressure Vessels, Division 3, Alternative Rules for
Construction of High Pressure Vessels (incorporated by
reference, see § 851.27);
(xxvii) BPVC.IX-2015, Section IX - Welding, Brazing and
Fusing Qualifications, Qualification Standard for Welding, Brazing,
and Fusing Procedures; Welders; Brazers; and Welding, Brazing, and
Fusing Operators (incorporated by reference, see § 851.27);
(xxviii) BPVC.X-2015, Section X, Fiber - Reinforced Plastic
Pressure Vessels (incorporated by reference, see § 851.27);
(xxix) BPVC.XI-2015, Section XI, Rules for Inservice
Inspection of Nuclear Power Plant Components (incorporated by
reference, see § 851.27);
(xxx) BPVC.XII-2015, Section XII, Rules for Construction and
Continued Service of Transport Tanks (incorporated by
reference, see § 851.27);
(xxxi) BPVC.CC.BPV-2015, Code Cases, Boilers and Pressure
Vessels (incorporated by reference, see § 851.27); and
(xxxii) BPVC.CC.NC-2015, Code Cases, Nuclear Components
(incorporated by reference, see § 851.27).
(2) The applicable ASME B31 code for pressure piping as
indicated in this paragraph; and or as indicated in paragraph
(b)(3) of this section:
(i) B31.1-2016, Power Piping (incorporated by reference,
see § 851.27);
(ii) B31.3-2014, Process Piping (incorporated by
reference, see § 851.27);
(iii) B31.4-2016, Pipeline Transportation Systems for Liquids
and Slurries (incorporated by reference, see § 851.27);
(iv) B31.5-2016, Refrigeration Piping and Heat Transfer
Components (incorporated by reference, see § 851.27);
(v) B31.8-2016, Gas Transmission and Distribution Piping
Systems (incorporated by reference, see § 851.27);
(vi) B31.8S-2014, Managing System Integrity of Gas
Pipelines (incorporated by reference, see § 851.27);
(vii) B31.9-2014, Building Services Piping (incorporated
by reference, see § 851.27); and
(viii) B31G-2012, Manual for Determining the Remaining
Strength of Corroded Pipelines (incorporated by reference, see
§ 851.27).
(3) The strictest applicable state and local codes.
(c) When national consensus codes are not applicable (because of
pressure range, vessel geometry, use of special materials, etc.),
contractors must implement measures to provide equivalent
protection and ensure a level of safety greater than or equal to
the level of protection afforded by the ASME or applicable state or
local code. Measures must include the following:
(1) Design drawings, sketches, and calculations must be reviewed
and approved by a qualified independent design professional
(i.e., professional engineer). Documented organizational
peer review is acceptable.
(2) Qualified personnel must be used to perform examinations and
inspections of materials, in-process fabrications, non-destructive
tests, and acceptance test.
(3) Documentation, traceability, and accountability must be
maintained for each unique pressure vessel or system, including
descriptions of design, pressure conditions, testing, inspection,
operation, repair, and maintenance.
5. Firearms Safety
(a) A contractor engaged in DOE activities involving the use of
firearms must establish firearms safety policies and procedures for
security operations, and training to ensure proper accident
prevention controls are in place.
(1) Written procedures must address firearms safety, engineering
and administrative controls, as well as personal protective
equipment requirements.
(2) As a minimum, procedures must be established for:
(i) Storage, handling, cleaning, inventory, and maintenance of
firearms and associated ammunition;
(ii) Activities such as loading, unloading, and exchanging
firearms. These procedures must address use of bullet containment
devices and those techniques to be used when no bullet containment
device is available;
(iii) Use and storage of pyrotechnics, explosives, and/or
explosive projectiles;
(iv) Handling misfires, duds, and unauthorized discharges;
(v) Live fire training, qualification, and evaluation
activities;
(vi) Training and exercises using engagement simulation
systems;
(vii) Medical response at firearms training facilities; and
(viii) Use of firing ranges by personnel other than DOE or DOE
contractor protective forces personnel.
(b) Contractors must ensure that personnel responsible for the
direction and operation of the firearms safety program are
professionally qualified and have sufficient time and authority to
implement the procedures under this section.
(c) Contractors must ensure that firearms instructors and
armorers have been certified by the Safeguards and Security
National Training Center to conduct the level of activity provided.
Personnel must not be allowed to conduct activities for which they
have not been certified.
(d) Contractors must conduct formal appraisals assessing
implementation of procedures, personnel responsibilities, and duty
assignments to ensure overall policy objectives and performance
criteria are being met by qualified personnel.
(e) Contractors must implement procedures related to firearms
training, live fire range safety, qualification, and evaluation
activities, including procedures requiring that:
(1) Personnel must successfully complete initial firearms safety
training before being issued any firearms. Authorization to remain
in armed status will continue only if the employee demonstrates the
technical and practical knowledge of firearms safety
semi-annually;
(2) Authorized armed personnel must demonstrate through
documented limited scope performance tests both technical and
practical knowledge of firearms handling and safety on a
semi-annual basis;
(3) All firearms training lesson plans must incorporate safety
for all aspects of firearms training task performance standards.
The lesson plans must follow the standards set forth by the
Safeguards and Security Central Training Academy's standard
training programs;
(4) Firearms safety briefings must immediately precede training,
qualifications, and evaluation activities involving live fire
and/or engagement simulation systems;
(5) A safety analysis approved by the Head of DOE Field Element
must be developed for the facilities and operation of each live
fire range prior to implementation of any new training,
qualification, or evaluation activity. Results of these analyses
must be incorporated into procedures, lesson plans, exercise plans,
and limited scope performance tests;
(6) Firing range safety procedures must be conspicuously posted
at all range facilities; and
(7) Live fire ranges, approved by the Head of DOE Field Element,
must be properly sited to protect personnel on the range, as well
as personnel and property not associated with the range.
(f) Contractors must ensure that the transportation, handling,
placarding, and storage of munitions conform to the applicable DOE
requirements.
6. Industrial Hygiene
Contractors must implement a comprehensive industrial hygiene
program that includes at least the following elements:
(a) Initial or baseline surveys and periodic resurveys and/or
exposure monitoring as appropriate of all work areas or operations
to identify and evaluate potential worker health risks;
(b) Coordination with planning and design personnel to
anticipate and control health hazards that proposed facilities and
operations would introduce;
(c) Coordination with cognizant occupational medical,
environmental, health physics, and work planning professionals;
(d) Policies and procedures to mitigate the risk from identified
and potential occupational carcinogens;
(e) Professionally and technically qualified industrial
hygienists to manage and implement the industrial hygiene program;
and
(f) Use of respiratory protection equipment tested under the DOE
Respirator Acceptance Program for Supplied-Air Suits when the
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health-approved
respiratory protection does not exist for DOE tasks that require
such equipment. For security operations military type masks for
respiratory protection by security personnel is acceptable.
7. Biological Safety
(a) Contractors must establish and implement a biological safety
program that:
(1) Establishes an Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC) or
equivalent. The IBC must:
(i) Review any work with biological etiologic agents for
compliance with applicable Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC), National Institutes of Health (NIH), World Health
Organization (WHO), United States Department of Agriculture Animal
and Plant Health Inspection Service (USDA/APHIS), and other
international, Federal, State, and local guidelines and assess the
containment level, facilities, procedures, practices, and training
and expertise of personnel; and
(ii) Review the site's security, safeguards, and emergency
management plans and procedures to ensure they adequately consider
work involving biological etiologic agents.
(2) Maintains an inventory and status of biological etiologic
agents, and provide to the responsible field and area office,
through the laboratory IBC (or its equivalent), an annual status
report describing the status and inventory of biological etiologic
agents and the biological safety program.
(3) Provides for submission to the appropriate Head of DOE Field
Element, for review and concurrence before transmittal to the
Federal Select Agent Program, each Laboratory Registration/Select
Agent Program registration application package (APHIS/CDC Form 1,
Application for Registration for Possession, Use, and Transfer of
Select Agents and Toxins) requesting registration of (or amendment
to a previously approved registration) a laboratory facility for
the purpose of possessing, using, or transferring biological select
agents and/or toxins.
(4) Provides for submission to the appropriate Head of DOE Field
Element, a copy of each APHIS/CDC Form 2, Request to Transfer
Select Agents and Toxins, upon initial submission of APHIS/CDC Form
2 to a vendor or other supplier requesting or ordering a biological
select agent or toxin for transfer, receipt, and handling in the
registered facility; and submission to the appropriate Head of DOE
Field Element the completed copy of the APHIS/CDC Form 2,
documenting final disposition and/or destruction of the select
agent or toxin, within 10 days of completion of the APHIS/CDC Form
2.
(5) Confirms that the site safeguards and security plans and
emergency management programs address biological etiologic agents,
with particular emphasis on biological select agents.
(6) Establishes an immunization policy for personnel working
with biological etiologic agents based on the evaluation of risk
and benefit of immunization.
(b) [Reserved]
8. Occupational Medicine
(a) Contractors must establish and provide comprehensive
occupational medicine services to workers employed at a covered
work place who:
(1) Work on a DOE site for more than 30 days in a 12-month
period; or
(2) Are enrolled for any length of time in a medical or exposure
monitoring program required by this rule and/or any other
applicable Federal, State or local regulation, or other
obligation.
(b) The occupational medicine services must be under the
direction of a graduate of a school of medicine or osteopathy who
is licensed for the practice of medicine in the state in which the
site is located.
(c) Occupational medical physicians, occupational health nurses,
physician's assistants, nurse practitioners, psychologists,
employee assistance counselors, and other occupational health
personnel providing occupational medicine services must be
licensed, registered, or certified as required by Federal or State
law where employed.
(d) Contractors must provide the occupational medicine providers
access to hazard information by promoting its communication,
coordination, and sharing among operating and environment, safety,
and health protection organizations.
(1) Contractors must provide the occupational medicine providers
with access to information on the following:
(i) Current information about actual or potential work-related
site hazards (chemical, radiological, physical, biological, or
ergonomic);
(ii) Employee job-task and hazard analysis information,
including essential job functions;
(iii) Actual or potential work-site exposures of each employee;
and
(iv) Personnel actions resulting in a change of job functions,
hazards or exposures.
(2) Contractors must notify the occupational medicine providers
when an employee has been absent because of an injury or illness
for more than 5 consecutive workdays (or an equivalent time period
for those individuals on an alternative work schedule);
(3) Contractors must provide the occupational medicine provider
information on, and the opportunity to participate in, worker
safety and health team meetings and committees;
(4) Contractors must provide occupational medicine providers
access to the workplace for evaluation of job conditions and issues
relating to workers' health.
(e) A designated occupational medicine provider must:
(1) Plan and implement the occupation medicine services; and
(2) Participate in worker protection teams to build and maintain
necessary partnerships among workers, their representatives,
managers, and safety and health protection specialists in
establishing and maintaining a safe and healthful workplace.
(f) A record, containing any medical, health history, exposure
history, and demographic data collected for the occupational
medicine purposes, must be developed and maintained for each
employee for whom medical services are provided. All occupational
medical records must be maintained in accordance with Executive
Order 13335, Incentives for the Use of Health Information
Technology.
(1) Employee medical, psychological, and employee assistance
program (EAP) records must be kept confidential, protected from
unauthorized access, and stored under conditions that ensure their
long-term preservation. Psychological records must be maintained
separately from medical records and in the custody the designated
psychologist in accordance with 10 CFR 712.38(b)(2).
(2) Access to these records must be provided in accordance with
DOE regulations implementing the Privacy Act and the Energy
Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act.
(g) The occupational medicine services provider must determine
the content of the worker health evaluations, which must be
conducted under the direction of a licensed physician, in
accordance with current sound and acceptable medical practices and
all pertinent statutory and regulatory requirements, such as the
Americans with Disabilities Act.
(1) Workers must be informed of the purpose and nature of the
medical evaluations and tests offered by the occupational medicine
provider.
(i) The purpose, nature and results of evaluations and tests
must be clearly communicated verbally and in writing to each worker
provided testing;
(ii) The communication must be documented in the worker's
medical record; and
(2) The following health evaluations must be conducted when
determined necessary by the occupational medicine provider for the
purpose of providing initial and continuing assessment of employee
fitness for duty.
(i) At the time of employment entrance or transfer to a job with
new functions and hazards, a medical placement evaluation of the
individual's general health and physical and psychological capacity
to perform work will establish a baseline record of physical
condition and assure fitness for duty.
(ii) Periodic, hazard-based medical monitoring or
qualification-based fitness for duty evaluations required by
regulations and standards, or as recommended by the occupational
medicine services provider, will be provided on the frequency
required.
(iii) Diagnostic examinations will evaluate employee's injuries
and illnesses to determine work-relatedness, the applicability of
medical restrictions, and referral for definitive care, as
appropriate.
(iv) After a work-related injury or illness or an absence due to
any injury or illness lasting 5 or more consecutive workdays (or an
equivalent time period for those individuals on an alternative work
schedule), a return to work evaluation will determine the
individual's physical and psychological capacity to perform work
and return to duty.
(v) At the time of separation from employment, individuals shall
be offered a general health evaluation to establish a record of
physical condition.
(h) The occupational medicine provider must monitor ill and
injured workers to facilitate their rehabilitation and safe return
to work and to minimize lost time and its associated costs.
(1) The occupational medicine provider must place an individual
under medical restrictions when health evaluations indicate that
the worker should not perform certain job tasks. The occupational
medicine provider must notify the worker and contractor management
when employee work restrictions are imposed or removed.
(i) Occupational medicine provider physician and medical staff
must, on a timely basis, communicate results of health evaluations
to management and safety and health protection specialists to
facilitate the mitigation of worksite hazards.
(j) The occupational medicine provider must include measures to
identify and manage the principal preventable causes of premature
morbidity and mortality affecting worker health and
productivity.
(1) The contractor must include programs to prevent and manage
these causes of morbidity when evaluations demonstrate their cost
effectiveness.
(2) Contractors must make available to the occupational medicine
provider appropriate access to information from health, disability,
and other insurance plans (de-identified as necessary) in order to
facilitate this process.
(k) The occupational medicine services provider must review and
approve the medical and behavioral aspects of employee counseling
and health promotional programs, including the following types:
(1) Contractor-sponsored or contractor-supported EAPs;
(2) Contractor-sponsored or contractor-supported alcohol and
other substance abuse rehabilitation programs; and
(3) Contractor-sponsored or contractor-supported wellness
programs.
(4) The occupational medicine services provider must review the
medical aspects of immunization programs, blood-borne pathogens
programs, and bio-hazardous waste programs to evaluate their
conformance to applicable guidelines.
(5) The occupational medicine services provider must develop and
periodically review medical emergency response procedures included
in site emergency and disaster preparedness plans. The medical
emergency responses must be integrated with nearby community
emergency and disaster plans.
9. Motor Vehicle Safety
(a) Contractors must implement a motor vehicle safety program to
protect the safety and health of all drivers and passengers in
Government-owned or -leased motor vehicles and powered industrial
equipment (i.e., fork trucks, tractors, platform lift
trucks, and other similar specialized equipment powered by an
electric motor or an internal combustion engine).
(b) The contractor must tailor the motor vehicle safety program
to the individual DOE site or facility, based on an analysis of the
needs of that particular site or facility.
(c) The motor vehicle safety program must address, as applicable
to the contractor's operations:
(1) Minimum licensing requirements (including appropriate
testing and medical qualification) for personnel operating motor
vehicles and powered industrial equipment;
(2) Requirements for the use of seat belts and provision of
other safety devices;
(3) Training for specialty vehicle operators;
(4) Requirements for motor vehicle maintenance and
inspection;
(5) Uniform traffic and pedestrian control devices and road
signs;
(6) On-site speed limits and other traffic rules;
(7) Awareness campaigns and incentive programs to encourage safe
driving; and
(8) Enforcement provisions.
10. Electrical Safety
Contractors must implement a comprehensive electrical safety
program appropriate for the activities at their site. This program
must meet the applicable electrical safety codes and standards
referenced in § 851.23.
11. Nanotechnology Safety - Reserved
The Department has chosen to reserve this section since policy
and procedures for nanotechnology safety are currently being
developed. Once these policies and procedures have been approved,
the rule will be amended to include them through a rulemaking
consistent with the Administrative Procedure Act.
12. Workplace Violence Prevention - Reserved
The Department has chosen to reserve this section since the
policy and procedures for workplace violence prevention are
currently being developed. Once these policies and procedures have
been approved, the rule will be amended to include them through a
rulemaking consistent with the Administrative Procedure Act.
[71 FR 6931, Feb. 9, 2006; 71 FR 36661, June 28, 2006; 80 FR 69566,
Nov. 10, 2015; 82 FR 59956, Dec. 18, 2017]
Appendix B to Part 851 - General Statement of Enforcement Policy
10:4.0.2.5.31.5.74.7.28 : Appendix B
Appendix B to Part 851 - General Statement of Enforcement Policy I.
Introduction
(a) This policy statement sets forth the general framework
through which the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) will seek to
ensure compliance with its worker safety and health regulations,
and, in particular, exercise the civil penalty authority provided
to DOE in section 3173 of Public Law 107-314, Bob Stump National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (December 2, 2002)
(“NDAA”), amending the Atomic Energy Act (AEA) to add section 234C.
The policy set forth herein is applicable to violations of safety
and health regulations in this part by DOE contractors, including
DOE contractors who are indemnified under the Price-Anderson Act,
42 U.S.C. 2210(d), and their subcontractors and suppliers
(hereafter collectively referred to as DOE contractors). This
policy statement is not a regulation and is intended only to
provide general guidance to those persons subject to the
regulations in this part. It is not intended to establish a
“cookbook” approach to the initiation and resolution of situations
involving noncompliance with the regulations in this part. Rather,
DOE intends to consider the particular facts of each noncompliance
in determining whether enforcement sanctions are appropriate and,
if so, the appropriate magnitude of those sanctions. DOE may well
deviate from this policy statement when appropriate in the
circumstances of particular cases. This policy statement is not
applicable to activities and facilities covered under E.O. 12344,
42 U.S.C. 7158 note, pertaining to Naval Nuclear Propulsion, or
otherwise excluded from the scope of the rule.
(b) The DOE goal in the compliance arena is to enhance and
protect the safety and health of workers at DOE facilities by
fostering a culture among both the DOE line organizations and the
contractors that actively seeks to attain and sustain compliance
with the regulations in this part. The enforcement program and
policy have been developed with the express purpose of achieving
safety inquisitiveness and voluntary compliance. DOE will establish
effective administrative processes and positive incentives to the
contractors for the open and prompt identification and reporting of
noncompliances, performance of effective root cause analysis, and
initiation of comprehensive corrective actions to resolve both
noncompliance conditions and program or process deficiencies that
led to noncompliance.
(c) In the development of the DOE enforcement policy, DOE
recognizes that the reasonable exercise of its enforcement
authority can help to reduce the likelihood of serious incidents.
This can be accomplished by placing greater emphasis on a culture
of safety in existing DOE operations, and strong incentives for
contractors to identify and correct noncompliance conditions and
processes in order to protect human health and the environment. DOE
wants to facilitate, encourage, and support contractor initiatives
for the prompt identification and correction of noncompliances. DOE
will give due consideration to such initiatives and activities in
exercising its enforcement discretion.
(d) DOE may modify or remit civil penalties in a manner
consistent with the adjustment factors set forth in this policy
with or without conditions. DOE will carefully consider the facts
of each case of noncompliance and will exercise appropriate
discretion in taking any enforcement action. Part of the function
of a sound enforcement program is to assure a proper and continuing
level of safety vigilance. The reasonable exercise of enforcement
authority will be facilitated by the appropriate application of
safety requirements to DOE facilities and by promoting and
coordinating the proper contractor and DOE safety compliance
attitude toward those requirements.
II. Purpose
The purpose of the DOE enforcement program is to promote and
protect the safety and health of workers at DOE facilities by:
(a) Ensuring compliance by DOE contractors with the regulations
in this part.
(b) Providing positive incentives for DOE contractors based
on:
(1) Timely self-identification of worker safety
noncompliances;
(2) Prompt and complete reporting of such noncompliances to
DOE;
(3) Prompt correction of safety noncompliances in a manner that
precludes recurrence; and
(4) Identification of modifications in practices or facilities
that can improve worker safety and health.
(c) Deterring future violations of DOE requirements by a DOE
contractor.
(d) Encouraging the continuous overall improvement of operations
at DOE facilities.
III. Statutory Authority
The Department of Energy Organization Act, 42 U.S.C. 7101-7385o,
the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974 (ERA), 42 U.S.C. 5801-5911,
and the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, (AEA) 42 U.S.C.
2011, require DOE to protect the public safety and health, as well
as the safety and health of workers at DOE facilities, in
conducting its activities, and grant DOE broad authority to achieve
this goal. Section 234C of the AEA makes DOE contractors (and their
subcontractors and suppliers thereto) covered by the DOE
Price-Anderson indemnification system, subject to civil penalties
for violations of the worker safety and health requirements
promulgated in this part. 42 U.S.C. 2282c.
IV. Responsibilities
(a) The Director, as the principal enforcement officer of the
DOE, has been delegated the authority to:
(1) Conduct enforcement inspections, investigations, and
conferences;
(2) Issue Notices of Violations and proposed civil penalties,
Enforcement Letters, Consent Orders, and subpoenas; and
(3) Issue orders to compel attendance and disclosure of
information or documents obtained during an investigation or
inspection. The Secretary issues Compliance Orders.
(b) The NNSA Administrator, rather than the Director, signs,
issues and serves the following actions that direct NNSA
contractors:
(1) Subpoenas;
(2) Orders to compel attendance; and
(3) Determines to disclose information or documents obtained
during an investigation or inspection, PNOVs, Notices of
Violations, and Final Notices of Violations. The NNSA Administrator
acts after consideration of the Director's recommendation.
V. Procedural Framework
(a) Title 10 CFR part 851 sets forth the procedures DOE will use
in exercising its enforcement authority, including the issuance of
Notices of Violation and the resolution of an administrative appeal
in the event a DOE contractor elects to petition the Office of
Hearings and Appeals for review.
(b) Pursuant to 10 CFR part 851 subpart E, the Director
initiates the enforcement process by initiating and conducting
investigations and inspections and issuing a Preliminary Notice of
Violation (PNOV) with or without a proposed civil penalty. The DOE
contractor is required to respond in writing to the PNOV within 30
days, either: (1) Admitting the violation and waiving its right to
contest the proposed civil penalty and paying it; (2) admitting the
violation but asserting the existence of mitigating circumstances
that warrant either the total or partial remission of the civil
penalty; or (3) denying that the violation has occurred and
providing the basis for its belief that the PNOV is incorrect.
After evaluation of the DOE contractor's response, the Director may
determine: (1) That no violation has occurred; (2) that the
violation occurred as alleged in the PNOV but that the proposed
civil penalty should be remitted in whole or in part; or (3) that
the violation occurred as alleged in the PNOV and that the proposed
civil penalty is appropriate, notwithstanding the asserted
mitigating circumstances. In the latter two instances, the Director
will issue a Final Notice of Violation (FNOV) or an FNOV and
proposed civil penalty.
(c) An opportunity to challenge an FNOV is provided in
administrative appeal provisions. See 10 CFR 851.44. Any contractor
that receives an FNOV may petition the Office of Hearings and
Appeals for review of the final notice in accordance with 10 CFR
part 1003, Subpart G, within 30 calendar days from receipt of the
final notice. An administrative appeal proceeding is not initiated
until the DOE contractor against which an FNOV has been issued
requests an administrative hearing rather than waiving its right to
contest the FNOV and proposed civil penalty, if any, and paying the
civil penalty. However, it should be emphasized that DOE encourages
the voluntary resolution of a noncompliance situation at any time,
either informally prior to the initiation of the enforcement
process or by consent order before or after any formal proceeding
has begun.
VI. Severity of Violations
(a) Violations of the worker safety and health requirements in
this part have varying degrees of safety and health significance.
Therefore, the relative safety and health risk of each violation
must be identified as the first step in the enforcement process.
Violations of the worker safety and health requirements are
categorized in two levels of severity to identify their relative
seriousness. Notices of Violation issued for noncompliance when
appropriate, propose civil penalties commensurate with the severity
level of the violations involved.
(b) To assess the potential safety and health impact of a
particular violation, DOE will categorize the potential severity of
violations of worker safety and health requirements as follows:
(1) A Severity Level I violation is a serious violation. A
serious violation shall be deemed to exist in a place of employment
if there is a potential that death or serious physical harm could
result from a condition which exists, or from one or more
practices, means, methods, operations, or processes which have been
adopted or are in use, in such place of employment A Severity Level
I violation would be subject to a base civil penalty of up to 100%
of the maximum base civil penalty of $100,535.
(2) A Severity Level II violation is an other-than-serious
violation. An other-than-serious violation occurs where the most
serious injury or illness that would potentially result from a
hazardous condition cannot reasonably be predicted to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees but does have a direct
relationship to their safety and health. A Severity Level II
violation would be subject to a base civil penalty up to 50% of the
maximum base civil penalty ($50,267).
(c) De minimis violations, defined as a deviation from the
requirement of a standard that has no direct or immediate
relationship to safety or health, will not be the subject of formal
enforcement action through the issuance of a Notice of
Violation.
VII. Enforcement Conferences
(a) The purpose of the enforcement conference is to:
(1) Assure the accuracy of the facts upon which the preliminary
determination to consider enforcement action is based;
(2) Discuss the potential or alleged violations, their
significance and causes, and the nature of and schedule for the DOE
contractor's corrective actions;
(3) Determine whether there are any aggravating or mitigating
circumstances; and
(4) Obtain other information which will help determine whether
enforcement action is appropriate and, if so, the extent of that
enforcement action.
(b) All enforcement conferences are convened at the discretion
of the Director.
(c) The PNOV will normally be issued promptly, before the
opportunity for an enforcement conference, following the
inspection/investigation. In some cases an enforcement conference
may be conducted onsite at the conclusion of an
inspection/investigation.
(d) The contractor may request an enforcement conference if they
believe additional information pertinent to the enforcement action
could best be conveyed through a meeting.
(e) DOE contractors will be informed prior to a meeting when
that meeting is considered to be an enforcement conference. Such
conferences are informal mechanisms for candid discussions
regarding potential or alleged violations and will not normally be
open to the public. In circumstances for which immediate
enforcement action is necessary in the interest of worker safety
and health, such action will be taken prior to the enforcement
conference, which may still be held after the necessary DOE action
has been taken.
VIII. Enforcement Letter
(a) In cases where DOE has decided not to conduct an
investigation or inspection or issue a Preliminary Notice of
Violation (PNOV), DOE may send an Enforcement Letter, signed by the
Director to the contractor. The Enforcement Letter is intended to
communicate the basis of the decision not to pursue enforcement
action for a noncompliance. The Enforcement Letter is intended to
direct contractors to the desired level of worker safety and health
performance. It may be used when DOE concludes that the specific
noncompliance at issue is not of the level of significance
warranted to conduct an investigation or inspection or for issuance
of a PNOV. Even where a noncompliance may be significant, the
Enforcement Letter may recognize that the contractor's actions may
have attenuated the need for enforcement action. The Enforcement
Letter will typically recognize how the contractor handled the
circumstances surrounding the noncompliance, address additional
areas requiring the contractor's attention, and address DOE's
expectations for corrective action.
(b) In general, Enforcement Letters communicate DOE's
expectations with respect to any aspect of the requirements of this
part, including identification and reporting of issues, corrective
actions, and implementation of the contractor's safety and health
program. DOE might, for example, wish to recognize some action of
the contractor that is of particular benefit to worker safety and
health that is a candidate for emulation by other contractors. On
the other hand, DOE may wish to bring a program shortcoming to the
attention of the contractor that, but for the lack of worker safety
and health significance of the immediate issue, might have resulted
in the issuance of a PNOV. An Enforcement Letter is not an
enforcement action.
(c) With respect to many noncompliances, an Enforcement Letter
may not be required. When DOE decides that a contractor has
appropriately corrected a noncompliance or that the significance of
the noncompliance is sufficiently low, it may close out its review
simply through an annotation in the DOE Noncompliance Tracking
System (NTS). A closeout of a noncompliance with or without an
Enforcement Letter may only take place after DOE has confirmed that
corrective actions have been completed.
IX. Enforcement Actions
(a) This section describes the enforcement sanctions available
to DOE and specifies the conditions under which each may be used.
The basic sanctions are Notices of Violation and civil
penalties.
(b) The nature and extent of the enforcement action is intended
to reflect the seriousness of the violation. For the vast majority
of violations for which DOE assigns severity levels as described
previously, a Notice of Violation will be issued, requiring a
formal response from the recipient describing the nature of and
schedule for corrective actions it intends to take regarding the
violation.
1. Notice of Violation
(a) A Notice of Violation (either a Preliminary or Final Notice)
is a document setting forth the conclusion of DOE and the basis to
support the conclusion, that one or more violations of the worker
safety and health requirements have occurred. Such a notice
normally requires the recipient to provide a written response which
may take one of several positions described in section V of this
policy statement. In the event that the recipient concedes the
occurrence of the violation, it is required to describe corrective
steps which have been taken and the results achieved; remedial
actions which will be taken to prevent recurrence; and the date by
which full compliance will be achieved.
(b) DOE will use the Notice of Violation as the standard method
for formalizing the existence of a violation and, in appropriate
cases as described in this section, the Notice of Violation will be
issued in conjunction with the proposed imposition of a civil
penalty. In certain limited instances, as described in this
section, DOE may refrain from the issuance of an otherwise
appropriate Notice of Violation. However, a Notice of Violation
will virtually always be issued for willful violations, or if past
corrective actions for similar violations have not been sufficient
to prevent recurrence and there are no other mitigating
circumstances.
(c) DOE contractors are not ordinarily cited for violations
resulting from matters not within their control, such as equipment
failures that were not avoidable by reasonable quality assurance
measures, proper maintenance, or management controls. With regard
to the issue of funding, however, DOE does not consider an asserted
lack of funding to be a justification for noncompliance with the
worker safety and health requirements.
(d) DOE expects its contractors to have the proper management
and supervisory systems in place to assure that all activities at
covered workplaces, regardless of who performs them, are carried
out in compliance with all the worker safety and health
requirements. Therefore, contractors are normally held responsible
for the acts of their employees and subcontractor employees in the
conduct of activities at covered workplaces. Accordingly, this
policy should not be construed to excuse personnel errors.
(e) The limitations on remedies under section 234C will be
implemented as follows:
(1) DOE may assess civil penalties of up to $100,535 per
violation per day on contractors (and their subcontractors and
suppliers) that are indemnified by the Price-Anderson Act, 42
U.S.C. 2210(d). See 10 CFR 851.5(a).
(2) DOE may seek contract fee reductions through the contract's
Conditional Payment of Fee Clause in the Department of
Energy Acquisition Regulation (DEAR). See 10 CFR 851.4(b);
48 CFR parts 923, 952, 970. Policies for contract fee reductions
are not established by this policy statement. The Director and
appropriate contracting officers will coordinate their efforts in
compliance with the statute. See 10 CFR 851.5(b).
(3) For the same violation of a worker safety and health
requirement in this part, DOE may pursue either civil penalties
(for indemnified contractors and their subcontractors and
suppliers) or a contract fee reduction, but not both. See 10
CFR 851.5(c).
(4) A ceiling applies to civil penalties assessed on certain
contractors specifically listed in 170d. of the Atomic Energy Act,
42 U.S.C. 2282a(d), for activities conducted at specified
facilities. For these contractors, the total amount of civil
penalties and contract penalties in a fiscal year may not exceed
the total amount of fees paid by DOE to that entity in that fiscal
year. See 10 CFR 851.5(d).
2. Civil Penalty
(a) A civil penalty is a monetary penalty that may be imposed
for violations of requirements of this part. See 10 CFR
851.5(a). Civil penalties are designed to emphasize the need for
lasting remedial action, deter future violations, and underscore
the importance of DOE contractor self-identification, reporting,
and correction of violations of the worker safety and health
requirements in this part.
(b) Absent mitigating circumstances as described below, or
circumstances otherwise warranting the exercise of enforcement
discretion by DOE as described in this section, civil penalties
will be proposed for Severity Level I and II violations.
(c) DOE will impose different base level penalties considering
the severity level of the violation. Table A-1 shows the daily base
civil penalties for the various categories of severity levels.
However, as described below in section IX, paragraph b.3, the
imposition of civil penalties will also take into account the
gravity, circumstances, and extent of the violation or violations
and, with respect to the violator, any history of prior similar
violations and the degree of culpability and knowledge.
(d) Enforcement personnel will use risk-based criteria to assist
the Director in determining appropriate civil penalties for
violations found during investigations and inspections.
(e) Regarding the factor of ability of DOE contractors to pay
the civil penalties, it is not DOE's intention that the economic
impact of a civil penalty be such that it puts a DOE contractor out
of business. Contract termination, rather than civil penalties, is
used when the intent is to terminate these activities. The
deterrent effect of civil penalties is best served when the amount
of such penalties takes this factor into account. However, DOE will
evaluate the relationship of affiliated entities to the contractor
(such as parent corporations) when the contractor asserts that it
cannot pay the proposed penalty.
(f) DOE will review each case on its own merits and adjust the
base civil penalty values upward or downward. As indicated below,
Table A-1 identifies the daily base civil penalty values for
different severity levels. After considering all relevant
circumstances, civil penalties may be adjusted up or down based on
the mitigating or aggravating factors described later in this
section. In no instance will a civil penalty for any one violation
exceed the statutory limit, as periodically adjusted for inflation
as required by law, per day. In cases where the DOE contractor had
knowledge of a violation and has not reported it to DOE and taken
corrective action despite an opportunity to do so, DOE will
consider utilizing its per day civil penalty authority. Further, as
described in this section, the duration of a violation will be
taken into account in adjusting the base civil penalty.
Table A-1 - Severity Level Base Civil
Penalties
Severity level |
Base civil penalty amount
(Percentage of maximum per violation per day) |
I |
100 |
II |
50 |
3. Adjustment Factors
(a) DOE may reduce a penalty based on mitigating circumstances
or increase a penalty based on aggravating circumstances. DOE's
enforcement program is not an end in itself, but a means to achieve
compliance with the worker safety and health requirements in this
part. Civil penalties are intended to emphasize the importance of
compliance and to deter future violations. The single most
important goal of the DOE enforcement program is to encourage early
identification and reporting of violations of the worker safety and
health requirements in this part by the DOE contractors themselves
rather than by DOE, and the prompt correction of any violations so
identified. DOE believes that DOE contractors are in the best
position to identify and promptly correct noncompliance with the
worker safety and health requirements in this part. DOE expects
that these contractors should have in place internal compliance
programs which will ensure the detection, reporting, and prompt
correction of conditions that may constitute, or lead to,
violations of the worker safety and health requirements in this
part, before, rather than after, DOE has identified such
violations. Thus, DOE contractors should almost always be aware of
worker safety and health noncompliances before they are discovered
by DOE. Obviously, worker safety and health is enhanced if
noncompliances are discovered (and promptly corrected) by the DOE
contractor, rather than by DOE, which may not otherwise become
aware of a noncompliance until later, during the course of an
inspection, performance assessment, or following an incident at the
facility. Early identification of worker safety and health-related
noncompliances by DOE contractors has the added benefit of allowing
information that could prevent such noncompliances at other
facilities in the DOE complex to be shared with other appropriate
DOE contractors.
(b) Pursuant to this enforcement philosophy, DOE will provide
substantial incentive for the early self-identification, reporting,
and prompt correction of conditions which constitute, or could lead
to, violations of the worker safety and health requirements. Thus,
the civil penalty may be reduced for violations that are
identified, reported, and promptly and effectively corrected by the
DOE contractor.
(c) On the other hand, ineffective programs for problem
identification and correction are aggravating circumstances and may
increase the penalty amount. Thus, for example, where a contractor
fails to disclose and promptly correct violations of which it was
aware or should have been aware, substantial civil penalties are
warranted and may be sought, including the assessment of civil
penalties for continuing violations on a per day basis.
(d) Further, in cases involving factors of willfulness, repeated
violations, death, serious injury, patterns of systemic violations,
DOE-identified flagrant violations, repeated poor performance in an
area of concern, or serious breakdown in management controls, DOE
intends to apply its full statutory enforcement authority where
such action is warranted.
(e) Additionally, adjustment to the amount of civil penalty will
be dependent, in part, on the degree of culpability of the DOE
contractor with regard to the violation. Thus, inadvertent
violations will be viewed differently from those in which there is
gross negligence, deception, or willfulness. In addition to the
severity of the underlying violation and level of culpability
involved, DOE will also consider the position, training and
experience of those involved in the violation. Thus, for example, a
violation may be deemed to be more significant if a senior manager
of an organization is involved rather than a foreman or
non-supervisory employee.
(f) Other factors that will be considered in determining the
civil penalty amount are the duration of the violation (how long
the condition has presented a potential exposure to workers), the
extent of the condition (number of instances of the violation), the
frequency of the exposure (how often workers are exposed), the
proximity of the workers to the exposure, and the past history of
similar violations.
(g) DOE expects contractors to provide full, complete, timely,
and accurate information and reports. Accordingly, the penalty
amount for a violation involving either a failure to make a
required report or notification to the DOE or an untimely report or
notification, will be based upon the circumstances surrounding the
matter that should have been reported. A contractor will not
normally be cited for a failure to report a condition or event
unless the contractor was aware or should have been aware of the
condition or event that it failed to report.
4. Identification and Reporting
Reduction of up to 50% of the base civil penalty shown in Table
A-1 may be given when a DOE contractor identifies the violation and
promptly reports the violation to the DOE. Consideration will be
given to, among other things, the opportunity available to discover
the violation, the ease of discovery and the promptness and
completeness of any required report. No consideration will be given
to a reduction in penalty if the DOE contractor does not take
prompt action to report the problem to DOE upon discovery, or if
the immediate actions necessary to restore compliance with the
worker safety and health requirements are not taken.
5. Self-Identification and Tracking Systems
(a) DOE strongly encourages contractors to self-identify
noncompliances with the worker safety and health requirements
before the noncompliances lead to a string of similar and
potentially more significant events or consequences. When a
contractor identifies a noncompliance, DOE will normally allow a
reduction in the amount of civil penalties, unless prior
opportunities existed for contractors to identify the
noncompliance. DOE will normally not allow a reduction in civil
penalties for self-identification if significant DOE intervention
was required to induce the contractor to report a
noncompliance.
(b) Self-identification of a noncompliance is possibly the
single most important factor in considering a reduction in the
civil penalty amount. Consideration of self-identification is
linked to, among other things, whether prior opportunities existed
to discover the violation, and if so, the age and number of such
opportunities; the extent to which proper contractor controls
should have identified or prevented the violation; whether
discovery of the violation resulted from a contractor's
self-monitoring activity; the extent of DOE involvement in
discovering the violation or in prompting the contractor to
identify the violation; and the promptness and completeness of any
required report. Self-identification is also considered by DOE in
deciding whether to pursue an investigation.
(c) DOE will use the voluntary Noncompliance Tracking System
(NTS) which allows contractors to elect to report noncompliances.
In the guidance document supporting the NTS, DOE will establish
reporting thresholds for reporting noncompliances of potentially
greater worker safety and health significance into the NTS.
Contractors are expected, however, to use their own self-tracking
systems to track noncompliances below the reporting threshold. This
self-tracking is considered to be acceptable self-reporting as long
as DOE has access to the contractor's system and the contractor's
system notes the item as a noncompliance with a DOE safety and
health requirement. For noncompliances that are below the NTS
reportability thresholds, DOE will credit contractor self-tracking
as representing self-reporting. If an item is not reported in NTS
but only tracked in the contractor's system and DOE subsequently
determines that the noncompliance was significantly
mischaracterized, DOE will not credit the internal tracking as
representing appropriate self-reporting.
6. Self-Disclosing Events
(a) DOE expects contractors to demonstrate acceptance of
responsibility for worker safety and health by proactively
identifying noncompliances. When the occurrence of an event
discloses noncompliances that the contractor could have or should
have identified before the event, DOE will not generally reduce
civil penalties for self-identification, even if the underlying
noncompliances were reported to DOE. In deciding whether to reduce
any civil penalty proposed for violations revealed by the
occurrence of a self-disclosing event, DOE will consider the ease
with which a contractor could have discovered the noncompliance and
the prior opportunities that existed to discover the noncompliance.
If a contractor simply reacts to events that disclose potentially
significant consequences or downplays noncompliances which did not
result in significant consequences to worker safety and health,
such contractor actions do not constitute the type of proactive
behavior necessary to prevent significant events from occurring and
thereby to improve worker safety and health.
(b) The key test is whether the contractor reasonably could have
detected any of the underlying noncompliances that contributed to
the event. Examples of events that provide opportunities to
identify noncompliances include, but are not limited to:
(1) Prior notifications of potential problems such as those from
DOE operational experience publications or vendor equipment
deficiency reports;
(2) Normal surveillance, quality assurance performance
assessments, and post-maintenance testing;
(3) Readily observable parameter trends; and
(4) Contractor employee or DOE observations of potential worker
safety and health problems.
(c) Failure to utilize these types of events and activities to
address noncompliances may result in higher civil penalty
assessments or a DOE decision not to reduce civil penalty
amounts.
(d) Alternatively, if, following a self-disclosing event, DOE
finds that the contractor's processes and procedures were adequate
and the contractor's personnel generally behaved in a manner
consistent with the contractor's processes and procedures, DOE
could conclude that the contractor could not have been reasonably
expected to find the single noncompliance that led to the event and
thus, might allow a reduction in civil penalties.
7. Corrective Action To Prevent Recurrence
The promptness (or lack thereof) and extent to which the DOE
contractor takes corrective action, including actions to identify
root cause and prevent recurrence, may result in an increase or
decrease in the base civil penalty shown in Table A-1. For example,
appropriate corrective action may result in DOE's reducing the
proposed civil penalty up to 50% from the base value shown in Table
A-1. On the other hand, the civil penalty may be increased if
initiation of corrective action is not prompt or if the corrective
action is only minimally acceptable. In weighing this factor,
consideration will be given to, among other things, the
appropriateness, timeliness and degree of initiative associated
with the corrective action. The comprehensiveness of the corrective
action will also be considered, taking into account factors such as
whether the action is focused narrowly to the specific violation or
broadly to the general area of concern.
8. DOE's Contribution to a Violation
There may be circumstances in which a violation of a DOE worker
safety and health requirement results, in part or entirely, from a
direction given by DOE personnel to a DOE contractor to either take
or forbear from taking an action at a DOE facility. In such cases,
DOE may refrain from issuing an NOV, or may mitigate, either
partially or entirely, any proposed civil penalty, provided that
the direction upon which the DOE contractor relied is documented in
writing, contemporaneously with the direction. It should be
emphasized, however, that pursuant to 10 CFR 851.7, interpretative
ruling of a requirement of this part must be issued in accordance
with the provisions of 851.7 to be binding. Further, as discussed
above in this policy statement, lack of funding by itself will not
be considered as a mitigating factor in enforcement actions.
9. Exercise of Discretion
Because DOE wants to encourage and support DOE contractor
initiative for prompt self-identification, reporting and correction
of noncompliances, DOE may exercise discretion as follows:
(a) In accordance with the previous discussion, DOE may refrain
from issuing a civil penalty for a violation that meets all of the
following criteria:
(1) The violation is promptly identified and reported to DOE
before DOE learns of it or the violation is identified by a DOE
independent assessment, inspection or other formal program
effort.
(2) The violation is not willful or is not a violation that
could reasonably be expected to have been prevented by the DOE
contractor's corrective action for a previous violation.
(3) The DOE contractor, upon discovery of the violation, has
taken or begun to take prompt and appropriate action to correct the
violation.
(4) The DOE contractor has taken, or has agreed to take,
remedial action satisfactory to DOE to preclude recurrence of the
violation and the underlying conditions that caused it.
(b) DOE will not issue a Notice of Violation for cases in which
the violation discovered by the DOE contractor cannot reasonably be
linked to the conduct of that contractor in the design,
construction or operation of the DOE facility involved, provided
that prompt and appropriate action is taken by the DOE contractor
upon identification of the past violation to report to DOE and
remedy the problem.
(c) In situations where corrective actions have been completed
before termination of an inspection or assessment, a formal
response from the contractor is not required and the inspection
report serves to document the violation and the corrective action.
However, in all instances, the contractor is required to report the
noncompliance through established reporting mechanisms so the
noncompliance and any corrective actions can be properly tracked
and monitored.
(d) If DOE initiates an enforcement action for a violation, and
as part of the corrective action for that violation, the DOE
contractor identifies other examples of the violation with the same
root cause, DOE may refrain from initiating an additional
enforcement action. In determining whether to exercise this
discretion, DOE will consider whether the DOE contractor acted
reasonably and in a timely manner appropriate to the severity of
the initial violation, the comprehensiveness of the corrective
action, whether the matter was reported, and whether the additional
violation(s) substantially change the significance or character of
the concern arising out of the initial violation.
(e) The preceding paragraphs are examples indicating when
enforcement discretion may be exercised to forego the issuance of a
civil penalty or, in some cases, the initiation of any enforcement
action at all. However, notwithstanding these examples, a civil
penalty may be proposed or Notice of Violation issued when, in
DOE's judgment, such action is warranted.
X. Inaccurate and Incomplete Information
(a) A violation of the worker safety and health requirements to
provide complete and accurate information to DOE, 10 CFR 851.40,
can result in the full range of enforcement sanctions, depending
upon the circumstances of the particular case and consideration of
the factors discussed in this section. Violations involving
inaccurate or incomplete information or the failure to provide
significant information identified by a DOE contractor normally
will be categorized based on the guidance in section IX,
“Enforcement Actions.”
(b) DOE recognizes that oral information may in some situations
be inherently less reliable than written submittals because of the
absence of an opportunity for reflection and management review.
However, DOE must be able to rely on oral communications from
officials of DOE contractors concerning significant information. In
determining whether to take enforcement action for an oral
statement, consideration will be given to such factors as:
(1) The degree of knowledge that the communicator should have
had regarding the matter in view of his or her position, training,
and experience;
(2) The opportunity and time available prior to the
communication to assure the accuracy or completeness of the
information;
(3) The degree of intent or negligence, if any, involved;
(4) The formality of the communication;
(5) The reasonableness of DOE reliance on the information;
(6) The importance of the information that was wrong or not
provided; and
(7) The reasonableness of the explanation for not providing
complete and accurate information.
(c) Absent gross negligence or willfulness, an incomplete or
inaccurate oral statement normally will not be subject to
enforcement action unless it involves significant information
provided by an official of a DOE contractor. However, enforcement
action may be taken for an unintentionally incomplete or inaccurate
oral statement provided to DOE by an official of a DOE contractor
or others on behalf of the DOE contractor, if a record was made of
the oral information and provided to the DOE contractor thereby
permitting an opportunity to correct the oral information, such as
if a transcript of the communication or meeting summary containing
the error was made available to the DOE contractor and was not
subsequently corrected in a timely manner.
(d) When a DOE contractor has corrected inaccurate or incomplete
information, the decision to issue a citation for the initial
inaccurate or incomplete information normally will be dependent on
the circumstances, including the ease of detection of the error,
the timeliness of the correction, whether DOE or the DOE contractor
identified the problem with the communication, and whether DOE
relied on the information prior to the correction. Generally, if
the matter was promptly identified and corrected by the DOE
contractor prior to reliance by DOE, or before DOE raised a
question about the information, no enforcement action will be taken
for the initial inaccurate or incomplete information. On the other
hand, if the misinformation is identified after DOE relies on it,
or after some question is raised regarding the accuracy of the
information, then some enforcement action normally will be taken
even if it is in fact corrected.
(e) If the initial submission was accurate when made but later
turns out to be erroneous because of newly discovered information
or advances in technology, a citation normally would not be
appropriate if, when the new information became available, the
initial submission was promptly corrected.
(f) The failure to correct inaccurate or incomplete information
that the DOE contractor does not identify as significant normally
will not constitute a separate violation. However, the
circumstances surrounding the failure to correct may be considered
relevant to the determination of enforcement action for the initial
inaccurate or incomplete statement. For example, an unintentionally
inaccurate or incomplete submission may be treated as a more severe
matter if a DOE contractor later determines that the initial
submission was in error and does not promptly correct it or if
there were clear opportunities to identify the error.
[71 FR 6931, Feb. 9, 2006, as amended at 74 FR 66033, Dec. 14,
2009; 79 FR 20, Jan. 2, 2014; 81 FR 41795, June 28, 2016; 81 FR
96352, Dec. 30, 2016; 83 FR 1292, Jan. 11, 2018; 83 FR 66084, Dec.
26, 2018; 85 FR 831, Jan. 8, 2020; 86 FR 2956, Jan. 14, 2021]